Spring 2026 · Section not specified
Instructor not extracted
Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Course record ASEN
ASEN 4028
Senior Projects 2: Design Practicum
University of Colorado Boulder
1,007 grades33 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score74/100
Strong
Jelliffe Kevin Jackson 374 grades · 1 term 3.85GPA
374 letter grades
Compare with the course
Jackson vs. the course average
A
+3.3
B
−3.2
C
−0.3
D
+0.2
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 374 enrolled.
Overall4.40 / 5
90 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.21
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.65
Contribution4.48
Discussion3.92
Inclusivity3.92
Grading4.31
Reflection4.55
Respect4.83
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.08
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.43
Questions3.81
Kathryn Anne Wingate 197 grades · 1 term 3.82GPA
197 letter grades
Compare with the course
Wingate vs. the course average
A
−1.6
B
+1.0
C
+0.7
D
−0.1
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 197 enrolled.
Overall4.67 / 5
309 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.41
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration4.66
Connection4.43
Contribution4.56
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity3.88
Grading4.21
Reflection4.35
Respect4.54
Creativity4.32
Feedback4.13
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.35
Questions4.30
Christopher Michael Muldrow 222 grades · 1 term 3.81GPA
222 letter grades
Compare with the course
Muldrow vs. the course average
A
−2.3
B
+2.2
C
+0.1
D
−0.1
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 222 enrolled.
Overall4.77 / 5
50 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Robert F Hodgkinson 214 grades · 1 term 3.79GPA
214 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hodgkinson vs. the course average
A
−1.9
B
+2.3
C
−0.3
D
−0.1
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 214 enrolled.
Overall4.58 / 5
212 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.48
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.11
Grading4.43
Reflection4.39
Respect4.74
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.42
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.59
Questions4.49
Zachary Sunberg 5 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.25
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.10
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.10
Questions4.40
Donna Sue Gerren 7 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.87
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.96
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.35
Reflection4.78
Respect5.00
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.96
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.53
Questions4.57
Allison Paige Anderson 39 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.97
Technology4.97
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.99
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.52
Grading4.71
Reflection4.93
Respect4.91
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.87
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.94
Questions4.93
Matthew E Rhode 8 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.62
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.77
Reflection5.00
Respect4.85
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.85
Questions4.77
Francisco Lopez Jimenez 15 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.67
Contribution4.57
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.01
Grading4.77
Reflection4.24
Respect5.00
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.83
Questions5.00
Dennis M Akos 57 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
57 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.83
Technology4.86
Synthesis4.83
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.62
Contribution4.86
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.36
Reflection4.81
Respect4.93
Creativity4.83
Feedback4.44
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.73
Questions4.75
Course documents
Syllabi 1
University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.