Spring 2026 · Section not specified
Instructor not extracted
Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Course record ASEN
ASEN 4028
Senior Projects 2: Design Practicum
University of Colorado Boulder
1,007 grades33 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score74/100
Strong
Jelliffe Kevin Jackson 374 grades · 1 term 3.85GPA
374 letter grades
Compare with the course
Jackson vs. the course average
A
+3.3
B
−3.2
C
−0.3
D
+0.2
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 374 enrolled.
Overall4.40 / 5
90 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.21
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.65
Contribution4.48
Discussion3.92
Inclusivity3.92
Grading4.31
Reflection4.55
Respect4.83
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.08
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.43
Questions3.81
Kathryn Anne Wingate 197 grades · 1 term 3.82GPA
197 letter grades
Compare with the course
Wingate vs. the course average
A
−1.6
B
+1.0
C
+0.7
D
−0.1
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 197 enrolled.
Overall4.67 / 5
309 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.41
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration4.66
Connection4.43
Contribution4.56
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity3.88
Grading4.21
Reflection4.35
Respect4.54
Creativity4.32
Feedback4.13
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.35
Questions4.30
Christopher Michael Muldrow 222 grades · 1 term 3.81GPA
222 letter grades
Compare with the course
Muldrow vs. the course average
A
−2.3
B
+2.2
C
+0.1
D
−0.1
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 222 enrolled.
Overall4.77 / 5
50 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Robert F Hodgkinson 214 grades · 1 term 3.79GPA
214 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hodgkinson vs. the course average
A
−1.9
B
+2.3
C
−0.3
D
−0.1
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 214 enrolled.
Overall4.58 / 5
212 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.48
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.11
Grading4.43
Reflection4.39
Respect4.74
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.42
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.59
Questions4.49
Zachary Sunberg 5 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.25
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.10
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.10
Questions4.40
Donna Sue Gerren 7 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.87
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.96
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.35
Reflection4.78
Respect5.00
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.96
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.53
Questions4.57
Allison Paige Anderson 39 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.97
Technology4.97
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.99
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.52
Grading4.71
Reflection4.93
Respect4.91
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.87
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.94
Questions4.93
Matthew E Rhode 8 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.62
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.77
Reflection5.00
Respect4.85
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.85
Questions4.77
Francisco Lopez Jimenez 15 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.67
Contribution4.57
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.01
Grading4.77
Reflection4.24
Respect5.00
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.83
Questions5.00
Dennis M Akos 57 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
57 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.83
Technology4.86
Synthesis4.83
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.62
Contribution4.86
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.36
Reflection4.81
Respect4.93
Creativity4.83
Feedback4.44
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.73
Questions4.75
John K Mah 32 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.54
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.47
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.53
Grading4.17
Reflection4.47
Respect4.59
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.64
Questions4.59
Yu T Morton 8 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.65
Technology4.73
Synthesis3.96
Collaboration3.85
Connection4.04
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity2.79
Grading4.10
Reflection4.15
Respect4.81
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.48
Interaction4.42
Challenge4.04
Questions4.92
Sanghamitra Neogi 2 reported responses 3.10Eval / 5
Overall3.10 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology2.50
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion3.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading1.00
Reflection5.00
Respect3.50
Creativity1.00
Feedback2.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge2.50
Questions3.50
Christopher Andrew Roseman 6 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.65
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.65
Reflection4.65
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.50
Questions4.15
Alexandra Le Moine 37 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.92
Technology4.92
Synthesis4.87
Collaboration4.79
Connection4.82
Contribution4.86
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.64
Grading4.62
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.63
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.95
Questions4.93
Yu Takahashi 6 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Jean N Koster 5 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology3.15
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.75
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.40
Reflection4.85
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.25
Questions4.60
Melvin Rafi 181 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
181 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.18
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.92
Contribution4.92
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.84
Reflection4.87
Respect4.93
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.88
Questions4.88
Marcus J Holzinger 4 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.85
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.85
Grading3.65
Reflection5.00
Respect4.65
Creativity4.85
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.65
Questions4.15
Dale A Lawrence 22 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.98
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.96
Collaboration4.99
Connection4.94
Contribution4.96
Discussion4.42
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.31
Reflection4.84
Respect4.93
Creativity4.83
Feedback3.64
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.63
Questions4.64
Matt Rhode 31 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.86
Technology4.86
Synthesis4.88
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.90
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.86
Grading4.83
Reflection4.87
Respect4.84
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.86
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.91
Questions4.90
Erik Knudsen 45 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.27
Synthesis4.69
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.68
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity3.87
Grading4.64
Reflection4.47
Respect4.91
Creativity4.79
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.74
Questions4.73
Trudy L Schwartz 174 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
174 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.34
Technology4.52
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.62
Connection4.34
Contribution4.52
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.34
Reflection4.24
Respect4.80
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.71
Challenge4.62
Questions4.42
Nisar Razzi Ahmed 19 reported responses 4.98Eval / 5
Overall4.98 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.97
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.87
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.93
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Robert Andrew Marshall 29 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.67
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.77
Reflection4.83
Respect4.90
Creativity4.93
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.77
Questions4.77
Sean Peters 22 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.97
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.90
Contribution4.97
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.93
Reflection4.80
Respect4.97
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.87
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.97
Khosro Ghobadi-Far 17 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.87
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.73
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.27
Reflection4.53
Respect4.97
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.77
Questions4.97
Xinlin Li 3 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Torin K Clark 3 reported responses 3.67Eval / 5
Overall3.67 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.67
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.33
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.67
Reflection3.00
Respect4.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.33
Challenge3.67
Questions3.67
Jeffrey Foster Glusman 6 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.27
Synthesis4.93
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.93
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.60
Reflection4.93
Respect4.93
Creativity4.27
Feedback4.27
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.93
Questions4.67
Tomoko Matsuo 4 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.00
Contribution4.20
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.70
Reflection4.20
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge5.00
Questions4.80
Charles M Hoke 3 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity2.30
Grading4.00
Reflection3.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.30
Questions5.00
Penina Axelrad 8 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.60
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.40
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.80
Course documents
Syllabi 1
University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.