Course record ASEN

ASEN 3802

Aerospace Sciences Lab II

University of Colorado Boulder

Grade distribution unavailable8 professors
Evaluations: 2023–2026
Flunk Score58/100
Mixed record

Professors 8 of 8

John A. Farnsworth 53 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

53 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.57
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.47
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.87
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.77
Questions4.77
Jeffrey Foster Glusman 170 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

170 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.59
Contribution4.74
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.13
Grading4.38
Reflection4.61
Respect4.57
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.34
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.62
Questions4.66
Francisco Lopez Jimenez 53 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

53 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.57
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.47
Grading4.53
Reflection4.60
Respect4.87
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.80
Questions4.73
Erik Knudsen 140 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5

140 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.89
Connection4.70
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.55
Reflection4.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.72
Questions4.64
Samantha Sheppard 74 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

74 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.32
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.17
Grading4.35
Reflection4.33
Respect4.65
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.62
Questions4.67
Charles M Hoke 37 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5

37 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.20
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.13
Grading4.20
Reflection4.30
Respect4.50
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.60
Questions4.47
John A Evans 80 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

80 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.62
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.50
Reflection4.65
Respect4.80
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.72
Questions4.75
Alexandra Le Moine 23 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.77
Contribution4.83
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.43
Grading3.97
Reflection4.77
Respect4.63
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.23
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.67
Questions4.73
Course documents

Syllabi 5

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Spring 2026 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Fall 2025 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Spring 2025 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
2 more syllabi

Fall 2024 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.