Spring 2025 · Section not specified
Instructor not extracted
Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Course record ASEN
ASEN 1320
Aerospace Computing and Engineering Applications
University of Colorado Boulder
1,044 grades7 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score19/100
Needs work
Khosro Ghobadi-Far 134 grades · 1 term 3.40GPA
134 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ghobadi-Far vs. the course average
A
+1.6
B
+5.0
C
−2.3
D
+0.5
F
−4.8
Difference in percentage points.
1.5% withdrew · 2 of 136 enrolled.
Overall4.22 / 5
157 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration3.85
Connection4.48
Contribution3.57
Discussion4.17
Inclusivity3.25
Grading4.22
Reflection4.22
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.77
Interaction4.19
Challenge4.42
Questions4.42
Nicholas G Rainville 290 grades · 1 term 3.34GPA
290 letter grades
Compare with the course
Rainville vs. the course average
A
+8.4
B
−2.8
C
−5.4
D
+0.9
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
2.4% withdrew · 7 of 297 enrolled.
Overall3.95 / 5
138 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.30
Contribution3.10
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity2.50
Grading4.30
Reflection4.00
Respect4.50
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.05
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.20
Questions4.10
Tomoko Matsuo 336 grades · 1 term 3.19GPA
336 letter grades
Compare with the course
Matsuo vs. the course average
A
+1.6
B
−2.0
C
+0.8
D
−0.6
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
3.7% withdrew · 13 of 349 enrolled.
Overall3.79 / 5
141 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.82
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.82
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.75
Contribution3.12
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity2.63
Grading3.48
Reflection3.49
Respect4.20
Creativity3.98
Feedback2.80
Interaction3.82
Challenge3.92
Questions3.53
Alexandra Le Moine 284 grades · 1 term 2.96GPA
284 letter grades
Compare with the course
Moine vs. the course average
A
−11.3
B
+2.9
C
+5.7
D
−0.4
F
+3.2
Difference in percentage points.
2.4% withdrew · 7 of 291 enrolled.
Overall3.37 / 5
214 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.12
Technology4.14
Synthesis3.46
Collaboration2.91
Connection3.43
Contribution2.54
Discussion3.19
Inclusivity1.86
Grading3.29
Reflection3.51
Respect3.53
Creativity3.27
Feedback2.57
Interaction3.59
Challenge3.73
Questions3.19
Lea Chandler 25 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.90
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.05
Connection4.45
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.05
Grading4.45
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.65
Questions4.60
Akash Ratheesh Babu 25 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration3.25
Connection3.70
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.20
Reflection4.25
Respect4.75
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.15
Challenge4.40
Questions4.55
Lyndsay Ruane 25 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration3.35
Connection4.20
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.10
Grading4.50
Reflection4.25
Respect4.60
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.40
Interaction3.85
Challenge4.35
Questions4.90
Course documents
Syllabi 2
University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.
Spring 2024 · Section not specified
Instructor not extracted
Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.