Course record ARTS

ARTS 2504

Basic Sculpture: Materials and Techniques

University of Colorado Boulder

Grade distribution unavailable9 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score73/100
Strong

Professors 9 of 9

Amy Hoagland 7 reported responses 3.81Eval / 5
Overall3.81 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.38
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.14
Collaboration3.05
Connection3.66
Contribution4.09
Discussion4.09
Inclusivity3.48
Grading2.85
Reflection3.14
Respect4.95
Creativity5.00
Feedback3.57
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.82
Questions4.14
Aaron Treher 10 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.42
Technology3.28
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.24
Connection4.87
Contribution4.92
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.71
Grading4.47
Reflection4.76
Respect4.90
Creativity4.94
Feedback4.97
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.95
Questions4.11
Cory Mckague 5 reported responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.07
Technology3.85
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration3.30
Connection2.92
Contribution3.85
Discussion3.85
Inclusivity3.30
Grading3.39
Reflection3.01
Respect4.62
Creativity3.85
Feedback3.46
Interaction3.08
Challenge4.23
Questions4.23
Dennis Kieran Doyle 34 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

34 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration4.71
Connection4.70
Contribution4.86
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.89
Grading4.74
Reflection4.87
Respect4.96
Creativity4.96
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.85
Questions4.94
Cody Lane Norton 10 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.91
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.82
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.82
Grading4.73
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.82
Challenge5.00
Questions4.91
Asa Mease 22 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.34
Technology4.39
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.25
Contribution4.71
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity4.59
Grading4.40
Reflection4.67
Respect4.87
Creativity4.93
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.93
Questions4.60
Ana Gonz<E1>Lez 9 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.85
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.65
Reflection5.00
Respect4.65
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.95
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Andrea Garcia 10 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.91
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.29
Connection4.75
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.95
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Ben Grossi 3 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.88
Technology4.88
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.88
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.