Course record ARTS
ARTS 2126
Digital Art 1
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable11 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score27/100
Below average
Corrina Maria Espinosa 123 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
123 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.91
Technology4.42
Synthesis4.54
Collaboration3.41
Connection4.21
Contribution3.97
Discussion4.29
Inclusivity4.32
Grading4.27
Reflection4.15
Respect4.52
Creativity4.47
Feedback3.94
Interaction4.15
Challenge4.21
Questions4.43
Cali Banks 20 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.54
Collaboration3.01
Connection4.05
Contribution4.32
Discussion4.51
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.10
Reflection4.13
Respect4.90
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.48
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.55
Questions4.25
Andrew Dilallo 32 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.34
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.87
Collaboration3.89
Connection4.71
Contribution4.71
Discussion4.76
Inclusivity4.34
Grading4.80
Reflection4.74
Respect4.90
Creativity4.97
Feedback4.87
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.83
Questions4.89
Francoise Dureese 1 reported responses 2.67Eval / 5
Overall2.67 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Technology2.00
Synthesis5.00
Connection4.00
Inclusivity1.00
Grading1.00
Reflection4.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.00
Questions1.00
Brianna Autin 33 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.43
Technology4.12
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration3.43
Connection3.48
Contribution3.84
Discussion3.81
Inclusivity3.41
Grading3.90
Reflection4.16
Respect3.87
Creativity4.44
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.19
Questions3.91
Andy Dilallo 9 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.09
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.94
Collaboration4.24
Connection4.63
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.91
Grading4.65
Reflection4.94
Respect5.00
Creativity4.96
Feedback4.69
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.96
Questions5.00
Francoise Duresse-Stimilli 2 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration1.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge3.50
Questions5.00
Dani Wasserman 2 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.23
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration2.00
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.46
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.23
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.23
Questions5.00
Alejandra Saldivar 15 reported responses 2.42Eval / 5
Overall2.42 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence1.70
Technology3.10
Synthesis3.55
Collaboration1.70
Connection3.10
Contribution3.55
Discussion3.00
Inclusivity2.05
Grading2.80
Reflection2.35
Respect2.55
Creativity3.30
Feedback1.70
Interaction2.55
Challenge2.00
Questions3.00
Ben Grossi 2 reported responses 4.02Eval / 5
Overall4.02 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.50
Reflection3.50
Respect4.50
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.50
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.