Course record ARTS
ARTS 2095
Ceramics 2: Wheelthrowing
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable11 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2024
Flunk Score52/100
Mixed record
Lauren N Mayer 11 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.88
Collaboration4.23
Connection4.69
Contribution4.77
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.84
Grading4.34
Reflection4.92
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.92
Questions5.00
Kimberly P Dickey 35 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology3.95
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.64
Connection4.31
Contribution4.86
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.35
Reflection4.75
Respect4.80
Creativity4.84
Feedback4.34
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.66
Questions4.30
Elizabeth Langyher 5 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.46
Contribution4.46
Discussion4.46
Inclusivity4.46
Grading4.85
Reflection4.46
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.62
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.46
Questions4.85
Jeanne Ellen Quinn 17 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.94
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.98
Collaboration4.31
Connection3.10
Contribution4.04
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity4.28
Grading4.62
Reflection4.68
Respect4.98
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.71
Questions4.98
Elisa Potts Wolcott 6 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.20
Technology4.50
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.30
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Sasha Alexandra 12 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.20
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.25
Reflection4.35
Respect5.00
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.90
Ryze Xu 7 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.10
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.00
Reflection4.60
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.70
Questions4.40
Scott H Chamberlin 4 reported responses 3.68Eval / 5
Overall3.68 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology2.30
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration3.20
Connection2.80
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.00
Inclusivity4.30
Grading2.20
Reflection4.00
Respect3.50
Creativity5.00
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.80
Questions4.20
Anna Graef 8 reported responses 3.56Eval / 5
Overall3.56 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.81
Technology3.81
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration2.97
Connection2.88
Contribution3.54
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.65
Reflection4.11
Respect4.20
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.20
Questions4.15
Natalie Thedford 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.