Course record ARTS
ARTS 2022
Beginning Drawing
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable9 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score41/100
Mixed recordKatie L Minyard 13 reported responses 3.90Eval / 5
Overall3.90 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.12
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration4.42
Connection4.38
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.28
Inclusivity4.62
Grading3.74
Reflection4.19
Respect4.07
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.01
Interaction4.38
Challenge3.95
Questions4.15
Robert Martin Buehler 7 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.20
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.70
Connection3.30
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.40
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Marina Kassianidou 28 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.44
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.88
Collaboration4.06
Connection3.82
Contribution4.83
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.83
Reflection4.66
Respect4.89
Creativity4.96
Feedback4.69
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.77
Questions4.81
Alli Lemon 4 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.50
Samira Hemmat 4 reported responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.50
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.20
Reflection4.00
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Hannah Purvis 5 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.00
Contribution4.60
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Alvin P Gregorio 7 reported responses 3.19Eval / 5
Overall3.19 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology2.20
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration3.60
Connection3.70
Contribution3.60
Discussion3.30
Inclusivity3.70
Grading1.60
Reflection3.30
Respect3.90
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.00
Interaction3.70
Challenge3.30
Questions3.40
Andrea Caretto 8 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology3.30
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.20
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.80
Reflection4.00
Respect4.20
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Cesar Bejarano Herrejon 9 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.12
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.16
Contribution3.69
Discussion3.86
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.12
Reflection3.95
Respect4.77
Creativity4.77
Feedback3.46
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.00
Questions3.69
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.