Course record ARTS
ARTS 1875
Ceramics for Non-Majors
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable15 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score68/100
Strong
Sasha Alexandra 9 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.00
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.30
Reflection4.20
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Joelle Taylor Cicak 16 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.88
Technology4.46
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.04
Connection4.01
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.31
Grading4.02
Reflection4.22
Respect4.92
Creativity4.92
Feedback4.92
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.85
Questions5.00
Emily Elizabeth Irvin 8 reported responses 3.56Eval / 5
Overall3.56 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology3.30
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration2.80
Connection3.10
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity3.70
Grading3.00
Reflection3.50
Respect4.10
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.80
Interaction3.80
Challenge3.60
Questions3.60
Kaitlin Elise Mccolgan 11 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Abigail Grix 33 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.94
Technology4.74
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration4.24
Connection4.07
Contribution4.74
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.78
Grading4.80
Reflection4.27
Respect4.96
Creativity4.97
Feedback4.56
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Elisa Potts Wolcott 39 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.33
Connection4.21
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.07
Grading4.71
Reflection4.62
Respect4.61
Creativity4.98
Feedback4.82
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.82
Questions4.92
Natalie Thedford Black 20 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.55
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.45
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.45
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.85
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.95
Questions4.95
Anna Graef 8 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.65
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.65
Contribution4.84
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.82
Reflection4.77
Respect4.95
Creativity4.95
Feedback4.93
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.95
Questions4.86
Ryze Xu 23 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.93
Collaboration4.21
Connection4.51
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.68
Grading4.48
Reflection4.71
Respect4.98
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.83
Questions4.80
Abi Bernstein 32 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.79
Collaboration4.33
Connection4.20
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.62
Grading4.71
Reflection4.77
Respect4.94
Creativity4.99
Feedback4.94
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.84
Questions4.97
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.