Course record ARTS
ARTS 1010
Introduction to Studio Art
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable32 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score41/100
Mixed record
Samantha Angelique Bares 18 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration3.62
Connection4.31
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.38
Grading4.35
Reflection4.25
Respect4.65
Creativity4.91
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.49
Challenge4.53
Questions4.95
Samara Johnson 53 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
53 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.61
Technology4.21
Synthesis4.44
Collaboration3.71
Connection3.86
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity4.15
Grading3.80
Reflection4.17
Respect4.53
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.56
Challenge4.28
Questions4.57
Meghan Chase 8 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.10
Reflection4.80
Respect4.60
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Georgianna Tsouhlarakis 32 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology3.88
Synthesis3.89
Collaboration3.37
Connection3.36
Contribution3.36
Discussion3.74
Inclusivity3.66
Grading2.92
Reflection3.61
Respect5.00
Creativity4.02
Feedback4.01
Interaction4.42
Challenge3.98
Questions3.45
Misuhng Suh 54 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
54 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.79
Technology2.77
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration3.26
Connection4.16
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.54
Inclusivity3.83
Grading3.01
Reflection3.58
Respect3.87
Creativity4.33
Feedback3.88
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.16
Questions3.38
Kaitlin Elise Mccolgan 13 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.80
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.52
Connection4.48
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.95
Reflection4.78
Respect5.00
Creativity4.83
Feedback4.88
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.88
Questions5.00
Sarah Jean Mccormick 25 reported responses 3.75Eval / 5
Overall3.75 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.12
Technology3.02
Synthesis3.45
Collaboration3.24
Connection3.42
Contribution3.20
Discussion3.40
Inclusivity3.80
Grading3.24
Reflection3.35
Respect3.33
Creativity3.83
Feedback3.01
Interaction3.89
Challenge3.08
Questions3.30
Allison Elizabeth Lemon 18 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.21
Synthesis4.49
Collaboration3.86
Connection4.02
Contribution4.69
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.42
Grading4.69
Reflection3.96
Respect4.58
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.48
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.37
Questions4.84
Noa Joyce Fodrie 16 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.98
Collaboration3.66
Connection4.56
Contribution4.94
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.95
Grading4.58
Reflection4.77
Respect4.98
Creativity4.96
Feedback4.76
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.76
Questions4.98
Cody Lane Norton 17 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.79
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.21
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.79
Contribution4.16
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.93
Grading4.14
Reflection4.55
Respect4.21
Creativity4.21
Feedback4.21
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.93
Questions3.78
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.