Course record ARTS
ARTS 1010
Introduction to Studio Art
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable32 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score41/100
Mixed record
Samantha Angelique Bares 18 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration3.62
Connection4.31
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.38
Grading4.35
Reflection4.25
Respect4.65
Creativity4.91
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.49
Challenge4.53
Questions4.95
Samara Johnson 53 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
53 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.61
Technology4.21
Synthesis4.44
Collaboration3.71
Connection3.86
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity4.15
Grading3.80
Reflection4.17
Respect4.53
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.56
Challenge4.28
Questions4.57
Meghan Chase 8 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.10
Reflection4.80
Respect4.60
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Georgianna Tsouhlarakis 32 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology3.88
Synthesis3.89
Collaboration3.37
Connection3.36
Contribution3.36
Discussion3.74
Inclusivity3.66
Grading2.92
Reflection3.61
Respect5.00
Creativity4.02
Feedback4.01
Interaction4.42
Challenge3.98
Questions3.45
Misuhng Suh 54 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
54 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.79
Technology2.77
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration3.26
Connection4.16
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.54
Inclusivity3.83
Grading3.01
Reflection3.58
Respect3.87
Creativity4.33
Feedback3.88
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.16
Questions3.38
Kaitlin Elise Mccolgan 13 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.80
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.52
Connection4.48
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.95
Reflection4.78
Respect5.00
Creativity4.83
Feedback4.88
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.88
Questions5.00
Sarah Jean Mccormick 25 reported responses 3.75Eval / 5
Overall3.75 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.12
Technology3.02
Synthesis3.45
Collaboration3.24
Connection3.42
Contribution3.20
Discussion3.40
Inclusivity3.80
Grading3.24
Reflection3.35
Respect3.33
Creativity3.83
Feedback3.01
Interaction3.89
Challenge3.08
Questions3.30
Allison Elizabeth Lemon 18 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.21
Synthesis4.49
Collaboration3.86
Connection4.02
Contribution4.69
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.42
Grading4.69
Reflection3.96
Respect4.58
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.48
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.37
Questions4.84
Noa Joyce Fodrie 16 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.98
Collaboration3.66
Connection4.56
Contribution4.94
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.95
Grading4.58
Reflection4.77
Respect4.98
Creativity4.96
Feedback4.76
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.76
Questions4.98
Cody Lane Norton 17 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.79
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.21
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.79
Contribution4.16
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.93
Grading4.14
Reflection4.55
Respect4.21
Creativity4.21
Feedback4.21
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.93
Questions3.78
Katheryn Grace Horne 20 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.93
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration3.58
Connection3.69
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity4.38
Grading4.69
Reflection4.18
Respect4.80
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.49
Challenge4.46
Questions4.69
Natalie Thedford Black 22 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.82
Collaboration4.52
Connection4.48
Contribution4.91
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.68
Grading4.48
Reflection4.78
Respect4.95
Creativity4.76
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.76
Questions4.71
Sierra Grove 12 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.93
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.71
Contribution4.98
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.82
Grading4.98
Reflection4.68
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.62
Questions4.82
Andi Newberry 16 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.96
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.64
Connection4.33
Contribution4.96
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.67
Grading5.00
Reflection4.93
Respect4.98
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.99
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.96
Questions4.99
Asa Mease 10 reported responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.31
Synthesis4.81
Collaboration3.69
Connection4.23
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.27
Reflection4.62
Respect4.65
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.54
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.46
Questions4.23
Molly Ott 23 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.22
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.96
Connection4.24
Contribution4.16
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.36
Grading4.06
Reflection4.38
Respect4.58
Creativity4.64
Feedback4.48
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.42
Questions4.70
Molly Valentine Dierks 99 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5
99 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.89
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.24
Collaboration4.13
Connection3.84
Contribution4.22
Discussion4.12
Inclusivity4.21
Grading3.81
Reflection4.04
Respect4.36
Creativity4.81
Feedback4.22
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.18
Questions4.43
Dati Alsaedi 15 reported responses 3.91Eval / 5
Overall3.91 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.02
Technology3.83
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration3.78
Connection3.88
Contribution3.88
Discussion3.74
Inclusivity4.43
Grading3.72
Reflection3.98
Respect4.78
Creativity4.82
Feedback3.94
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.09
Questions3.98
Emily Moyer 18 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.98
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.87
Collaboration4.29
Connection4.17
Contribution4.52
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.49
Grading4.69
Reflection4.69
Respect4.86
Creativity4.99
Feedback4.79
Interaction4.69
Challenge4.57
Questions5.00
Abi Bernstein 13 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.26
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.02
Connection4.71
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.32
Grading4.97
Reflection4.30
Respect4.36
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.51
Challenge4.70
Questions4.98
Abigail Grix 10 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology4.09
Synthesis4.39
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.38
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity4.87
Grading3.89
Reflection4.49
Respect4.49
Creativity4.59
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.49
Challenge4.30
Questions4.30
Tiana Boisseau-Palo 15 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.41
Technology3.93
Synthesis4.08
Collaboration3.42
Connection3.41
Contribution3.86
Discussion4.43
Inclusivity3.51
Grading3.80
Reflection3.84
Respect4.59
Creativity4.39
Feedback4.17
Interaction4.26
Challenge3.89
Questions4.37
Annaliese Cole-Weiss 7 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.60
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.10
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.70
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Luis Perez Moreno 12 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.87
Technology4.07
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.78
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity4.16
Grading4.53
Reflection4.45
Respect4.67
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.82
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.67
Questions4.67
Erin Hyunhee Kang 18 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.97
Collaboration3.93
Connection4.66
Contribution4.94
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.68
Grading4.70
Reflection4.86
Respect4.92
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.96
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.93
Questions4.90
Andrea Garcia 13 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.92
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.49
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.11
Reflection4.47
Respect4.92
Creativity4.69
Feedback4.69
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.39
Questions4.69
Paul Kenneth 48 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
48 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.44
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.97
Collaboration4.69
Connection4.53
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.79
Reflection4.90
Respect4.98
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.91
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.93
Questions4.98
Carrie Berglund 10 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology3.75
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration4.32
Connection4.68
Contribution4.86
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.63
Grading4.23
Reflection4.84
Respect4.86
Creativity4.93
Feedback4.79
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.70
Questions4.91
Eileen Hinckle 3 reported responses 4.02Eval / 5
Overall4.02 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology3.30
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.30
Connection2.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.00
Reflection3.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.30
Questions4.30
Molly Pluenneke 14 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.80
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Amy Hoagland 3 reported responses 3.90Eval / 5
Overall3.90 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration3.30
Connection3.30
Contribution3.50
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect4.70
Creativity5.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction3.70
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Jules Jackson 3 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.