Course record ARTH
ARTH 6939
Graduate Seminar: Open Topics in Art History
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable9 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score70/100
Strong
Brianne Caitlin Cohen 28 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.89
Technology3.36
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.94
Connection4.78
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.83
Grading4.71
Reflection4.96
Respect4.83
Creativity4.81
Feedback4.81
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.82
Questions4.83
Erin Marie Espelie 16 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.74
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration4.09
Connection4.88
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity4.92
Grading4.52
Reflection4.76
Respect5.00
Creativity4.21
Feedback3.63
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.48
Questions4.91
Annette W De Stecher 25 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.76
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.41
Collaboration4.76
Connection4.40
Contribution4.44
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.43
Grading4.88
Reflection4.67
Respect4.66
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.48
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.43
Questions4.91
James M. Cordova 4 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.99
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.69
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.99
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.69
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.98
Stephanie Wenhui Su 9 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.98
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.98
Collaboration4.98
Connection5.00
Contribution4.98
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.98
Grading4.94
Reflection4.98
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.98
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.98
Questions5.00
Crystal Nelson 6 reported responses 4.98Eval / 5
Overall4.98 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.98
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.98
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Reece Luke Auguiste 1 reported responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading2.00
Reflection4.00
Respect4.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Cam Nelson 3 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.70
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.30
Sonja Gandert 6 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.