Course record ARTH
ARTH 2029
Art and Archaeology of Ancient Egypt
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable13 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score43/100
Mixed record
Travis Rick Rupp 134 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
134 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.22
Technology4.58
Synthesis3.67
Collaboration3.38
Connection4.43
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.65
Reflection4.56
Respect4.93
Creativity4.28
Feedback4.23
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.30
Questions4.94
William Seth Frost 13 reported responses 3.92Eval / 5
Overall3.92 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.95
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration3.40
Connection3.55
Contribution3.65
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.10
Reflection4.10
Respect4.50
Creativity3.95
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.90
Questions4.55
Catherine Marie Newell 11 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration3.85
Connection3.90
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.55
Reflection4.10
Respect4.85
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.20
Questions4.75
Richard Frank Ciolek 7 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.50
Contribution3.35
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.90
Reflection4.60
Respect4.85
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.65
Questions4.75
Hannah Madeline Slough 10 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.15
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.60
Reflection4.75
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.35
Questions4.85
Andrew Rivadeneira 5 reported responses 3.20Eval / 5
Overall3.20 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.65
Technology3.50
Synthesis2.90
Collaboration3.25
Connection2.85
Contribution3.25
Discussion3.50
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.40
Reflection3.25
Respect4.90
Creativity2.60
Feedback2.60
Interaction2.90
Challenge3.00
Questions5.00
Claire Hook 4 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.00
Contribution4.85
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.15
Respect5.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.65
Questions5.00
Louis Mainwaring Foster 9 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.55
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.55
Respect5.00
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.95
Questions4.95
Danise Wu 8 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.65
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.95
Grading4.70
Reflection4.80
Respect4.95
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.65
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.95
Phoebe Mock 8 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.90
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.