Course record ARSC
ARSC 5040
Arts and Sciences Special Topics
University of Colorado Boulder
31 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2024
Flunk Score87/100
Excellent
Brian Keegan 11 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
11 letter grades · Limited sample
15.4% withdrew · 2 of 13 enrolled.
Overall4.95 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Carole Ann Mcgranahan Ph.D. 10 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
10 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 10 enrolled.
Nickoal Lyn Eichmann 10 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
10 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 10 enrolled.
Overall4.67 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.40
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Carole Ann Mcgranahan 2 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Terra Greenw Mckinnish-Harllee 5 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.40
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions5.00
Leslie Jane Irvine 4 reported responses 4.93Eval / 5
Overall4.93 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.80
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Aditya Ranganath 7 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.54
Collaboration3.14
Connection5.00
Contribution4.72
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.08
Grading4.98
Reflection4.82
Respect4.82
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.08
Interaction4.27
Challenge5.00
Questions4.82
Jordan Wrigley 8 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Andrew Philips 3 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.50
Connection5.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.70
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Kathryn Elissa Goldfarb 3 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.30
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.70
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.