Course record AREN

AREN 4319

Architectural Engineering Design 2

University of Colorado Boulder

59 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2022–2026
Flunk Score77/100
Strong

Professors 10 of 10

Kyri A Baker 30 grades · 1 term 3.89GPA
90.0% A
10.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

30 letter grades

Compare with the course
Baker vs. the course average
A −3.2
B +3.2
C same
D same
F same

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 30 enrolled.

Joseph Hoberg Arehart 29 grades · 1 term 3.80GPA
96.6% A
3.4% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

29 letter grades

Compare with the course
Arehart vs. the course average
A +3.3
B −3.3
C same
D same
F same

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 29 enrolled.

Jay Hoberg Arehart 47 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

47 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.92
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.87
Contribution4.91
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.69
Grading4.76
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.93
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.89
Questions4.77
Moncef Krarti 5 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology3.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.20
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection3.80
Respect5.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.50
Questions4.00
Christopher T Senseney 72 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

72 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.31
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.92
Connection4.67
Contribution4.83
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity4.07
Grading4.15
Reflection4.52
Respect4.11
Creativity4.39
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.24
Questions4.17
Nathan Jeremy Taylor 72 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

72 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.92
Connection4.67
Contribution4.83
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.07
Grading4.64
Reflection4.52
Respect4.67
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.72
Questions4.69
Sandra L. Vasconez 72 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5

72 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.92
Connection4.67
Contribution4.83
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.07
Grading4.76
Reflection4.52
Respect4.85
Creativity4.83
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.83
Questions4.85
Mitchell James Hanson 15 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.30
Reflection4.50
Respect4.60
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Jonathan Eric Brooks 44 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5

44 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.92
Connection4.67
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity4.05
Grading4.38
Reflection4.52
Respect4.54
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.62
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.62
Questions4.62
Thomas Steven Soell 27 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.60
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.70
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.