Course record ARCH
ARCH 4100
Studio 3: Capstone in Architecture
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable17 professors
Evaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score57/100
Mixed record
Justin T Bellucci 5 reported responses 3.29Eval / 5
Overall3.29 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.20
Technology3.20
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.60
Contribution3.40
Discussion3.20
Inclusivity4.60
Grading2.80
Reflection3.00
Respect5.00
Creativity3.60
Feedback2.40
Interaction4.40
Challenge2.80
Questions2.40
Betsy Holt Johnson 11 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.60
Connection5.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Shawhin Roudbari 13 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.50
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.70
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.70
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.10
John Brandon Anderson 47 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
47 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.81
Collaboration4.44
Connection4.76
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.46
Inclusivity4.48
Grading4.14
Reflection4.48
Respect4.74
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.48
Ping Xu 49 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology3.97
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.47
Connection4.53
Contribution3.90
Discussion3.94
Inclusivity4.02
Grading4.35
Reflection4.49
Respect4.44
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.66
Challenge4.60
Questions4.34
Gage Christopher Duran 2 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Jade Venus Polizzi 22 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.88
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.79
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.79
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.68
Grading4.48
Reflection4.79
Respect4.78
Creativity4.98
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.88
Questions4.89
Susan Atkinson Glenn 22 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.82
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.82
Grading4.13
Reflection4.80
Respect4.95
Creativity4.93
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.93
Questions4.95
Harvey Marc Hine 2 reported responses 3.97Eval / 5
Overall3.97 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection5.00
Contribution3.50
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect4.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge3.00
Questions4.00
Kristin Louise Nothwehr 2 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection5.00
Contribution3.50
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.