Course record APRD
APRD 7004
Doctoral Professionalization Seminar
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable9 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score66/100
StrongIrma J Fisher 7 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.90
Connection5.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Elizabeth A Skewes 4 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Patrick Richard Ferrucci 17 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.79
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.96
Connection5.00
Contribution4.82
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.94
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.96
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.98
Questions5.00
Erin N Willis 7 reported responses 4.93Eval / 5
Overall4.93 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.90
Connection5.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.70
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Hun Shik Kim 6 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.00
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Tobias Hopp 1 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.00
Respect4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Kay Weaver 11 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.32
Connection4.45
Contribution4.43
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.63
Grading4.07
Reflection4.43
Respect4.72
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.36
Interaction4.45
Challenge3.97
Questions4.72
Christopher Joseph Vargo 4 reported responses 3.57Eval / 5
Overall3.57 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration2.80
Connection4.80
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.30
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.30
Reflection3.50
Respect4.00
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.70
Interaction3.20
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Ever Josue Figueroa 3 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.30
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.