Course record APRD
APRD 3105
Public Relations Strategy and Implementation
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable11 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score66/100
Strong
Dawn Doty 70 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
70 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.71
Collaboration4.46
Connection4.90
Contribution4.81
Discussion4.89
Inclusivity4.69
Grading4.45
Reflection4.53
Respect4.76
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.54
Challenge4.86
Questions4.82
Ron Henry Iori 16 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.92
Collaboration4.75
Connection5.00
Contribution4.72
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.95
Respect4.91
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.95
Questions4.85
Seow Ting Lee 56 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
56 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.60
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.70
Respect4.75
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.75
Questions4.75
Erin N Willis 41 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.81
Collaboration4.69
Connection4.98
Contribution4.56
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.31
Reflection4.66
Respect4.67
Creativity4.54
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.63
Questions4.71
Karen B Reid 33 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.49
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.92
Connection4.62
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.28
Reflection4.67
Respect4.77
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.67
Questions4.62
Emily Anne King Kinsey 2 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology2.50
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Jordan Morehouse 46 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.64
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.64
Connection4.78
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.74
Grading4.67
Reflection4.45
Respect4.74
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.64
Questions4.63
Loni Marie Peterson 3 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.30
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.30
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Jane E Dvorak 7 reported responses 4.93Eval / 5
Overall4.93 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.70
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.90
Connection5.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.90
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge5.00
Questions4.70
Gillian E Hamburger 56 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
56 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.71
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration4.22
Connection4.76
Contribution4.42
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity4.46
Grading4.76
Reflection4.61
Respect4.81
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.81
Interaction4.71
Challenge4.66
Questions4.81
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.