Course record APRD

APRD 3104

Digital Storytelling for Public Relations

University of Colorado Boulder

Grade distribution unavailable9 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score58/100
Mixed record

Professors 9 of 9

Dayna L Davis 14 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.90
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.40
Questions4.90
Samantha Fields Alviani 44 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5

44 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.96
Synthesis4.86
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.86
Contribution4.86
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.86
Reflection4.86
Respect4.96
Creativity4.96
Feedback4.96
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.91
Questions4.96
Kevin J. Hoth 15 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.30
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.30
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.20
Questions3.90
Keyana Simone 10 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.40
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.30
Reflection4.20
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.40
Dexter Allan Ballard 13 reported responses 3.12Eval / 5
Overall3.12 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.80
Technology3.10
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration4.60
Connection2.80
Contribution3.50
Discussion2.60
Inclusivity3.10
Grading1.90
Reflection2.40
Respect4.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.10
Interaction4.20
Challenge2.80
Questions2.90
Daniel Lewis Paul 4 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.80
Reflection3.30
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.70
William Holden 61 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

61 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.67
Connection4.64
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.33
Reflection4.57
Respect4.85
Creativity4.44
Feedback4.64
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.55
Questions4.82
Emilie Johnson 29 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

29 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.99
Connection4.62
Contribution4.81
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.79
Reflection4.84
Respect4.80
Creativity4.97
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.74
Questions4.89
Heather Renee Schmitz-Smith 22 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.70
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.90
Grading3.70
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.30
Questions4.40
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.