Course record APRD
APRD 3010
Consumer Insights
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable18 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score58/100
Mixed record
Fabiana Kahn 13 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.60
Contribution4.10
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.50
Reflection4.40
Respect4.50
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Jennifer Colman 13 reported responses 4.94Eval / 5
Overall4.94 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Courtney Kerwin 24 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.30
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.50
Mark David Heisten 27 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.90
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Sarah Wofford 22 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.85
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.40
Reflection4.70
Respect4.95
Creativity4.45
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.80
Questions4.70
Nicole Hering 33 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.91
Contribution4.93
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.69
Grading4.85
Reflection4.86
Respect4.94
Creativity4.84
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.71
Questions4.90
David William Nottoli 73 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
73 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.71
Collaboration4.53
Connection4.73
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.37
Grading4.58
Reflection4.73
Respect4.55
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.65
Questions4.71
Nicole Pavlica 8 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.90
Grading3.90
Reflection5.00
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge5.00
Questions4.80
John Colin Mcqueeney 29 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.95
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.60
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.90
Questions4.85
George Scott Bain 13 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.91
Technology4.86
Synthesis4.91
Collaboration4.61
Connection4.75
Contribution4.91
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.32
Grading4.15
Reflection4.86
Respect4.93
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.91
Questions4.93
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.