Course record APRD
APRD 3009
Brand Building
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable17 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score67/100
Strong
Mark David Heisten 62 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
62 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.86
Synthesis4.98
Collaboration4.52
Connection4.90
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.84
Grading4.84
Reflection4.82
Respect4.98
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.69
Challenge4.92
Questions4.86
Erin E Schauster 42 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.64
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.72
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.54
Grading4.63
Reflection4.67
Respect4.84
Creativity4.69
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.63
Questions4.82
Devin Reiter 22 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.91
Technology4.96
Synthesis4.96
Collaboration4.72
Connection5.00
Contribution4.94
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.87
Grading4.77
Reflection4.94
Respect4.96
Creativity4.94
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.91
Questions4.93
Diane Marie Elliston 9 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.25
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.24
Collaboration4.24
Connection3.51
Contribution3.38
Discussion3.12
Inclusivity3.82
Grading3.51
Reflection3.20
Respect3.82
Creativity4.06
Feedback4.68
Interaction3.82
Challenge3.75
Questions4.06
Brian D Mc Carthy 12 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology4.36
Synthesis2.96
Collaboration3.18
Connection4.23
Contribution4.02
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity3.39
Grading4.77
Reflection4.00
Respect4.91
Creativity3.95
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.98
Challenge3.95
Questions4.79
Amy Viverito 12 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.90
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.40
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.80
Nicole Hering 5 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
David William Nottoli 11 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Morgan Young 162 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
162 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.81
Technology4.29
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.89
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.68
Grading4.18
Reflection4.72
Respect4.67
Creativity4.81
Feedback4.14
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.83
Questions4.62
Cleanthe Gerakos Fisher 6 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.38
Connection4.23
Contribution3.92
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect4.15
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.23
Challenge4.15
Questions4.23
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.