Course record APRD
APRD 2005
Strategic Communication Writing
University of Colorado Boulder
1,427 grades40 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score42/100
Mixed record
Samantha Fields Alviani 167 grades · 1 term 3.72GPA
167 letter grades
Compare with the course
Alviani vs. the course average
A
+26.6
B
−18.8
C
−5.8
D
−1.1
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
1.2% withdrew · 2 of 169 enrolled.
Dawn Doty 1,260 grades · 1 term 3.29GPA
1,260 letter grades
Compare with the course
Doty vs. the course average
A
−3.5
B
+2.5
C
+0.8
D
+0.1
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
1.3% withdrew · 16 of 1,276 enrolled.
Overall4.23 / 5
299 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.36
Technology4.46
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration3.98
Connection4.69
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.21
Inclusivity4.18
Grading4.37
Reflection4.37
Respect4.35
Creativity4.71
Feedback3.83
Interaction4.37
Challenge4.43
Questions4.37
Joshua Ross Foust 13 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology3.12
Synthesis4.79
Collaboration3.16
Connection4.98
Contribution4.81
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.92
Grading4.76
Reflection4.53
Respect4.52
Creativity4.32
Feedback4.06
Interaction4.34
Challenge4.79
Questions4.79
Augustine Botwe 18 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology3.95
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.35
Connection4.20
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.10
Reflection4.15
Respect4.55
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.05
Challenge4.10
Questions4.10
Jackson Reed 7 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.60
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Colette Czarnecki 17 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.13
Connection4.39
Contribution4.87
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.31
Grading4.74
Reflection4.61
Respect4.57
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.39
Questions4.78
Daniel P Shanahan 7 reported responses 4.99Eval / 5
Overall4.99 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.90
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Tara Janelle Nathan 25 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.72
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.53
Reflection4.85
Respect4.81
Creativity4.98
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.73
Questions4.68
Kaitlyn Elayne Wright 40 reported responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.07
Technology4.24
Synthesis3.93
Collaboration3.81
Connection4.03
Contribution4.32
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.04
Reflection3.87
Respect4.79
Creativity4.42
Feedback3.71
Interaction4.38
Challenge3.97
Questions4.08
Danielle Santos Quichocho 14 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.79
Collaboration4.01
Connection5.00
Contribution4.96
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.81
Grading4.96
Reflection4.79
Respect5.00
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.98
Questions4.86
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.