Course record APRD
APRD 2005
Strategic Communication Writing
University of Colorado Boulder
1,427 grades40 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score42/100
Mixed record
Samantha Fields Alviani 167 grades · 1 term 3.72GPA
167 letter grades
Compare with the course
Alviani vs. the course average
A
+26.6
B
−18.8
C
−5.8
D
−1.1
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
1.2% withdrew · 2 of 169 enrolled.
Dawn Doty 1,260 grades · 1 term 3.29GPA
1,260 letter grades
Compare with the course
Doty vs. the course average
A
−3.5
B
+2.5
C
+0.8
D
+0.1
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
1.3% withdrew · 16 of 1,276 enrolled.
Overall4.23 / 5
299 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.36
Technology4.46
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration3.98
Connection4.69
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.21
Inclusivity4.18
Grading4.37
Reflection4.37
Respect4.35
Creativity4.71
Feedback3.83
Interaction4.37
Challenge4.43
Questions4.37
Joshua Ross Foust 13 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology3.12
Synthesis4.79
Collaboration3.16
Connection4.98
Contribution4.81
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.92
Grading4.76
Reflection4.53
Respect4.52
Creativity4.32
Feedback4.06
Interaction4.34
Challenge4.79
Questions4.79
Augustine Botwe 18 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology3.95
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.35
Connection4.20
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.10
Reflection4.15
Respect4.55
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.05
Challenge4.10
Questions4.10
Jackson Reed 7 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.60
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Colette Czarnecki 17 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.13
Connection4.39
Contribution4.87
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.31
Grading4.74
Reflection4.61
Respect4.57
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.39
Questions4.78
Daniel P Shanahan 7 reported responses 4.99Eval / 5
Overall4.99 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.90
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Tara Janelle Nathan 25 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.72
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.53
Reflection4.85
Respect4.81
Creativity4.98
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.73
Questions4.68
Kaitlyn Elayne Wright 40 reported responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.07
Technology4.24
Synthesis3.93
Collaboration3.81
Connection4.03
Contribution4.32
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.04
Reflection3.87
Respect4.79
Creativity4.42
Feedback3.71
Interaction4.38
Challenge3.97
Questions4.08
Danielle Santos Quichocho 14 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.79
Collaboration4.01
Connection5.00
Contribution4.96
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.81
Grading4.96
Reflection4.79
Respect5.00
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.98
Questions4.86
Carlos Eduardo Back Vianna 2 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Seow Ting Lee 22 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.22
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.90
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.47
Reflection4.85
Respect4.52
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.62
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.72
Questions4.75
Michelle Denise Miles 2 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology3.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions3.50
Mark David Heisten 17 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.90
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.85
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Melissa A Pickett 21 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology4.99
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.79
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.96
Grading4.79
Reflection4.80
Respect4.98
Creativity4.81
Feedback3.83
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.61
Questions4.62
Carol Y Anderson-Reinhardt 24 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.62
Connection4.65
Contribution4.56
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity4.46
Grading4.63
Reflection4.67
Respect4.56
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.49
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.49
Questions4.77
Emily Anne King Kinsey 17 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.75
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect4.85
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.65
Questions5.00
Kate Friedel 29 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.74
Collaboration4.56
Connection4.39
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.24
Grading4.67
Reflection4.63
Respect4.78
Creativity4.83
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.79
Questions4.77
Pritha Agarwal 16 reported responses 2.76Eval / 5
Overall2.76 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.59
Technology2.89
Synthesis2.51
Collaboration3.51
Connection2.43
Contribution2.85
Discussion3.30
Inclusivity2.90
Grading3.04
Reflection2.69
Respect3.29
Creativity3.18
Feedback2.58
Interaction2.84
Challenge2.70
Questions3.01
Jane Lauren Caulfield 5 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.65
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading5.00
Reflection4.85
Respect4.85
Creativity4.85
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Pulung Perbawani 17 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.97
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.88
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.92
Contribution4.56
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.83
Reflection4.77
Respect5.00
Creativity4.89
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.92
Questions4.84
Kwaku Botwe 4 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.80
Questions4.50
Kyle Harris 11 reported responses 4.94Eval / 5
Overall4.94 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.98
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.87
Collaboration4.41
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.87
Grading5.00
Reflection4.98
Respect5.00
Creativity4.89
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.89
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Raaj Chandran 2 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Olivia Zhou 2 reported responses 3.90Eval / 5
Overall3.90 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration2.50
Connection3.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity2.50
Grading4.50
Reflection3.00
Respect4.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction3.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Brock Mays 33 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.94
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration4.92
Connection4.94
Contribution4.94
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.51
Grading4.95
Reflection4.89
Respect4.95
Creativity4.89
Feedback4.78
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.78
Questions5.00
Hunter Reeves 27 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.22
Connection4.70
Contribution4.41
Discussion4.56
Inclusivity4.41
Grading4.76
Reflection4.71
Respect4.65
Creativity4.46
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.61
Questions4.93
Matea Beukelman 25 reported responses 3.97Eval / 5
Overall3.97 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology4.23
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.47
Contribution4.27
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity3.69
Grading4.29
Reflection4.30
Respect4.52
Creativity4.28
Feedback4.51
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.33
Questions4.91
Emily King Kinsey 14 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.90
Contribution4.75
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.45
Reflection4.57
Respect4.77
Creativity4.95
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.63
Questions4.95
Yu-Han Wu 23 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.44
Technology4.42
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.14
Connection4.60
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.54
Grading4.49
Reflection4.68
Respect4.68
Creativity4.71
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.56
Questions4.55
Erin E Schauster 103 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
103 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology4.11
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.48
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.18
Inclusivity4.23
Grading3.90
Reflection4.44
Respect4.30
Creativity4.37
Feedback3.64
Interaction4.24
Challenge4.12
Questions4.11
Jianhua Lu 19 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.44
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.44
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.10
Reflection4.60
Respect4.62
Creativity4.52
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.64
Challenge4.62
Questions4.50
Sara Alatmi 28 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.89
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.87
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.86
Contribution4.79
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.82
Grading4.86
Reflection4.92
Respect4.86
Creativity4.79
Feedback4.82
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.89
Questions4.82
Shreyoshi Ghosh 3 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.70
Connection5.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading5.00
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Qiongye Chen 7 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.25
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.10
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.25
Questions4.40
Mushfique Wadud 10 reported responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.10
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.10
Grading3.30
Reflection4.10
Respect4.30
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.20
Questions3.70
Shahed Rahman 6 reported responses 4.96Eval / 5
Overall4.96 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.85
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.85
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions5.00
Cheri Lynn Felix 61 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
61 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.50
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions4.80
Hunter Krajewski 7 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.90
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.30
Reflection4.90
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.70
Questions4.50
Jordan Morehouse 10 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.90
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.50
Grading5.00
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.