Course record APRD

APRD 2004

Introduction to Research Methods and Insights

University of Colorado Boulder

1,530 grades32 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score28/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 32

Tobias Hopp 1,530 grades · 1 term 3.02GPA
31.4% A
47.1% B
20.1% C
0.6% D
0.8% F

1,530 letter grades

1.8% withdrew · 28 of 1,558 enrolled.

Kaitlyn Elayne Wright 14 reported responses 3.53Eval / 5
Overall3.53 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology3.61
Synthesis3.88
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.01
Contribution4.02
Discussion3.24
Inclusivity3.78
Grading2.12
Reflection3.67
Respect3.85
Creativity3.79
Feedback1.34
Interaction4.13
Challenge3.02
Questions2.05
Christopher Eric Vardeman 35 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

35 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.94
Connection4.69
Contribution4.56
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.58
Grading4.63
Reflection4.55
Respect4.78
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.54
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.65
Questions4.81
Yue Liu 11 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.45
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.00
Reflection4.20
Respect4.65
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.40
Questions4.65
Saima A Kazmi 30 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.21
Technology4.19
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.79
Connection4.08
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.22
Inclusivity4.19
Grading3.93
Reflection4.63
Respect4.49
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.14
Interaction4.37
Challenge4.33
Questions4.45
Emily Anne King Kinsey 24 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.24
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.89
Connection4.49
Contribution4.71
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity4.82
Grading4.48
Reflection4.70
Respect4.28
Creativity4.63
Feedback3.88
Interaction4.95
Challenge3.91
Questions4.13
Augustine Botwe 24 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.64
Connection4.69
Contribution4.66
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.62
Grading4.60
Reflection4.66
Respect4.72
Creativity4.61
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.69
Questions4.64
Stacy Louise Lanyon 14 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.30
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.15
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.25
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.45
Questions4.65
Joshua Ross Foust 6 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.30
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.20
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback3.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Pritha Agarwal 35 reported responses 3.38Eval / 5
Overall3.38 / 5

35 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.24
Technology4.04
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.71
Connection4.47
Contribution4.19
Discussion4.05
Inclusivity4.14
Grading3.80
Reflection4.17
Respect4.19
Creativity4.31
Feedback3.42
Interaction4.42
Challenge4.03
Questions3.89
Show all 32 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.