Course record APRD
APRD 2004
Introduction to Research Methods and Insights
University of Colorado Boulder
1,530 grades32 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score28/100
Below average
Tobias Hopp 1,530 grades · 1 term 3.02GPA
1,530 letter grades
1.8% withdrew · 28 of 1,558 enrolled.
Overall4.45 / 5
319 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration3.93
Connection4.59
Contribution4.03
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.47
Grading4.46
Reflection4.32
Respect4.72
Creativity4.46
Feedback3.97
Interaction4.49
Challenge4.48
Questions4.58
Kaitlyn Elayne Wright 14 reported responses 3.53Eval / 5
Overall3.53 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology3.61
Synthesis3.88
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.01
Contribution4.02
Discussion3.24
Inclusivity3.78
Grading2.12
Reflection3.67
Respect3.85
Creativity3.79
Feedback1.34
Interaction4.13
Challenge3.02
Questions2.05
Christopher Eric Vardeman 35 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.94
Connection4.69
Contribution4.56
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.58
Grading4.63
Reflection4.55
Respect4.78
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.54
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.65
Questions4.81
Yue Liu 11 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.45
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.00
Reflection4.20
Respect4.65
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.40
Questions4.65
Saima A Kazmi 30 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.21
Technology4.19
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.79
Connection4.08
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.22
Inclusivity4.19
Grading3.93
Reflection4.63
Respect4.49
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.14
Interaction4.37
Challenge4.33
Questions4.45
Emily Anne King Kinsey 24 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.24
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.89
Connection4.49
Contribution4.71
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity4.82
Grading4.48
Reflection4.70
Respect4.28
Creativity4.63
Feedback3.88
Interaction4.95
Challenge3.91
Questions4.13
Augustine Botwe 24 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.64
Connection4.69
Contribution4.66
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.62
Grading4.60
Reflection4.66
Respect4.72
Creativity4.61
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.69
Questions4.64
Stacy Louise Lanyon 14 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.30
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.15
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.25
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.45
Questions4.65
Joshua Ross Foust 6 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.30
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.20
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback3.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Pritha Agarwal 35 reported responses 3.38Eval / 5
Overall3.38 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.24
Technology4.04
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.71
Connection4.47
Contribution4.19
Discussion4.05
Inclusivity4.14
Grading3.80
Reflection4.17
Respect4.19
Creativity4.31
Feedback3.42
Interaction4.42
Challenge4.03
Questions3.89
Rajesh Chandran 14 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.81
Technology4.92
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.81
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.69
Grading4.50
Reflection4.84
Respect4.92
Creativity4.84
Feedback4.81
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.81
Questions5.00
Kwaku Botwe 15 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.22
Synthesis4.61
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.62
Contribution4.21
Discussion3.93
Inclusivity3.80
Grading3.95
Reflection4.03
Respect4.76
Creativity4.41
Feedback4.22
Interaction4.70
Challenge3.87
Questions4.37
Olivia Zhou 25 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.19
Technology4.28
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.89
Connection4.35
Contribution4.29
Discussion3.99
Inclusivity3.97
Grading4.07
Reflection4.38
Respect4.37
Creativity4.70
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.74
Challenge3.77
Questions4.05
Melissa A Pickett 26 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.60
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity4.24
Grading4.64
Reflection4.52
Respect4.67
Creativity4.61
Feedback4.17
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.55
Questions4.68
Kate Friedel 12 reported responses 3.34Eval / 5
Overall3.34 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.37
Technology3.07
Synthesis3.23
Collaboration4.33
Connection3.50
Contribution3.13
Discussion3.00
Inclusivity3.90
Grading3.20
Reflection3.13
Respect4.03
Creativity3.23
Feedback2.80
Interaction3.67
Challenge3.23
Questions3.00
Henry Ugwu 135 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
135 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.59
Connection4.51
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.64
Inclusivity4.46
Grading4.37
Reflection4.50
Respect4.74
Creativity4.56
Feedback4.36
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.54
Questions4.66
Seow Ting Lee 15 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.20
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.00
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.30
Questions4.10
Pulung Perbawani 13 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.91
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.76
Collaboration4.96
Connection4.52
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.59
Reflection4.39
Respect4.91
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.39
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.76
Questions4.89
Hunter Reeves 11 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.60
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.85
Reflection4.75
Respect4.75
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.75
Questions4.85
Erin N Willis 1 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Reflection5.00
Interaction4.00
Kyle Harris 1 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Shahed Rahman 46 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.27
Contribution4.31
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.18
Grading4.29
Reflection4.37
Respect4.65
Creativity4.49
Feedback3.72
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.29
Questions4.48
Brock Mays 34 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.21
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.79
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.56
Inclusivity4.01
Grading4.75
Reflection4.81
Respect4.77
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.53
Questions4.90
Woojin Kim 220 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
220 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.44
Technology4.74
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration4.27
Connection4.52
Contribution4.29
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity4.44
Grading4.51
Reflection4.44
Respect4.78
Creativity4.44
Feedback4.17
Interaction4.66
Challenge4.48
Questions4.71
Isabella Escobedo 3 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.70
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Gbenga Arikenbi 4 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.20
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.20
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.00
Questions4.50
Jianhua Lu 24 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.52
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.74
Connection4.34
Contribution4.29
Discussion4.51
Inclusivity4.51
Grading4.57
Reflection4.36
Respect4.49
Creativity4.34
Feedback4.29
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.49
Questions4.81
Matea Beukelman 12 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.91
Synthesis4.91
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.84
Contribution4.91
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.84
Grading4.86
Reflection4.88
Respect4.95
Creativity4.91
Feedback4.86
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.91
Questions4.95
Bachchu Shekh 12 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.70
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.85
Reflection4.70
Respect4.75
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.50
Questions4.85
Yu-Han Wu 16 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.74
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.65
Contribution4.91
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.74
Grading4.69
Reflection4.79
Respect5.00
Creativity4.52
Feedback4.26
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.51
Questions4.76
Hunter Krajewski 11 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.60
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.90
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Sara Alatmi 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.