Course record APRD

APRD 1004

Fundamentals of Grammar

University of Colorado Boulder

3,382 grades12 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score21/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 12

Rajesh Chandran 472 grades · 1 term 3.44GPA
63.8% A
27.8% B
4.9% C
1.9% D
1.7% F

472 letter grades

Compare with the course
Chandran vs. the course average
A +15.4
B −11.1
C −4.6
D +0.5
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

2.1% withdrew · 10 of 482 enrolled.

Samantha Fields Alviani 445 grades · 1 term 3.35GPA
54.4% A
36.2% B
7.0% C
0.4% D
2.0% F

445 letter grades

Compare with the course
Alviani vs. the course average
A +6.0
B −2.7
C −2.5
D −0.9
F +0.1

Difference in percentage points.

1.5% withdrew · 7 of 452 enrolled.

Jennifer Colman 56 grades · 1 term 3.24GPA
28.6% A
64.3% B
7.1% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

56 letter grades

Compare with the course
Colman vs. the course average
A −19.8
B +25.4
C −2.3
D −1.4
F −1.9

Difference in percentage points.

1.8% withdrew · 1 of 57 enrolled.

Jane Lauren Caulfield 1,957 grades · 1 term 3.20GPA
45.7% A
39.9% B
10.7% C
1.7% D
2.0% F

1,957 letter grades

Compare with the course
Caulfield vs. the course average
A −2.6
B +1.0
C +1.2
D +0.3
F +0.1

Difference in percentage points.

1.3% withdrew · 26 of 1,983 enrolled.

Danielle Santos Quichocho 452 grades · 1 term 3.18GPA
40.0% A
45.8% B
11.7% C
0.7% D
1.8% F

452 letter grades

Compare with the course
Quichocho vs. the course average
A −8.3
B +6.9
C +2.2
D −0.7
F −0.1

Difference in percentage points.

2.2% withdrew · 10 of 462 enrolled.

Tobias Hopp 4 reported responses 3.41Eval / 5
Overall3.41 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration1.00
Connection3.50
Contribution1.00
Discussion2.30
Inclusivity4.50
Grading5.00
Reflection4.30
Respect3.50
Creativity2.30
Feedback3.70
Interaction3.70
Challenge3.80
Questions5.00
Raaj Chandran 86 reported responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5

86 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration2.70
Connection4.10
Contribution3.30
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.50
Reflection4.20
Respect4.50
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Brock Mays 9 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.70
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.10
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.60
Questions5.00
Mark David Heisten 169 reported responses 3.92Eval / 5
Overall3.92 / 5

169 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.42
Synthesis3.92
Collaboration3.16
Connection4.10
Contribution3.35
Discussion3.86
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.45
Reflection4.15
Respect4.30
Creativity3.82
Feedback3.53
Interaction3.82
Challenge4.22
Questions4.43
Kate Friedel 1 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration1.00
Connection5.00
Contribution1.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction2.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Show all 12 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.