Course record APRD
APRD 1004
Fundamentals of Grammar
University of Colorado Boulder
3,382 grades12 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score21/100
Below average
Rajesh Chandran 472 grades · 1 term 3.44GPA
472 letter grades
Compare with the course
Chandran vs. the course average
A
+15.4
B
−11.1
C
−4.6
D
+0.5
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
2.1% withdrew · 10 of 482 enrolled.
Samantha Fields Alviani 445 grades · 1 term 3.35GPA
445 letter grades
Compare with the course
Alviani vs. the course average
A
+6.0
B
−2.7
C
−2.5
D
−0.9
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
1.5% withdrew · 7 of 452 enrolled.
Overall3.98 / 5
71 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.60
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.30
Connection3.90
Contribution3.50
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.30
Reflection4.00
Respect4.50
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.20
Questions4.40
Jennifer Colman 56 grades · 1 term 3.24GPA
56 letter grades
Compare with the course
Colman vs. the course average
A
−19.8
B
+25.4
C
−2.3
D
−1.4
F
−1.9
Difference in percentage points.
1.8% withdrew · 1 of 57 enrolled.
Jane Lauren Caulfield 1,957 grades · 1 term 3.20GPA
1,957 letter grades
Compare with the course
Caulfield vs. the course average
A
−2.6
B
+1.0
C
+1.2
D
+0.3
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
1.3% withdrew · 26 of 1,983 enrolled.
Overall3.77 / 5
374 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.69
Technology4.55
Synthesis3.87
Collaboration3.17
Connection3.93
Contribution3.42
Discussion3.99
Inclusivity3.65
Grading4.34
Reflection4.00
Respect4.50
Creativity3.68
Feedback3.52
Interaction4.17
Challenge4.08
Questions4.42
Danielle Santos Quichocho 452 grades · 1 term 3.18GPA
452 letter grades
Compare with the course
Quichocho vs. the course average
A
−8.3
B
+6.9
C
+2.2
D
−0.7
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
2.2% withdrew · 10 of 462 enrolled.
Overall4.01 / 5
97 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration3.10
Connection3.90
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.30
Reflection4.20
Respect4.70
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.30
Questions4.40
Tobias Hopp 4 reported responses 3.41Eval / 5
Overall3.41 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration1.00
Connection3.50
Contribution1.00
Discussion2.30
Inclusivity4.50
Grading5.00
Reflection4.30
Respect3.50
Creativity2.30
Feedback3.70
Interaction3.70
Challenge3.80
Questions5.00
Raaj Chandran 86 reported responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5
86 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration2.70
Connection4.10
Contribution3.30
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.50
Reflection4.20
Respect4.50
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Brock Mays 9 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.70
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.10
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.60
Questions5.00
Mark David Heisten 169 reported responses 3.92Eval / 5
Overall3.92 / 5
169 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.42
Synthesis3.92
Collaboration3.16
Connection4.10
Contribution3.35
Discussion3.86
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.45
Reflection4.15
Respect4.30
Creativity3.82
Feedback3.53
Interaction3.82
Challenge4.22
Questions4.43
Kate Friedel 1 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration1.00
Connection5.00
Contribution1.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction2.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Loni Marie Peterson 156 reported responses 3.97Eval / 5
Overall3.97 / 5
156 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.01
Technology4.55
Synthesis3.93
Collaboration3.28
Connection4.05
Contribution3.52
Discussion3.97
Inclusivity3.65
Grading4.51
Reflection4.25
Respect4.38
Creativity3.95
Feedback3.58
Interaction3.68
Challenge4.28
Questions4.38
Melissa A Pickett 2 reported responses 3.70Eval / 5
Overall3.70 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.50
Technology4.00
Synthesis2.50
Collaboration1.00
Connection3.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion3.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.00
Respect4.00
Creativity2.50
Feedback2.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.