Course record APPM
APPM 7400
Topics in Applied Mathematics
University of Colorado Boulder
132 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score76/100
Strong
Anne Margaret Dougherty 54 grades · 1 term 4.00GPA
54 letter grades
Compare with the course
Dougherty vs. the course average
A
+3.0
B
−1.5
C
same
D
−1.5
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 54 enrolled.
Overall4.64 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.41
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.86
Connection4.73
Contribution4.91
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.71
Grading4.50
Reflection4.76
Respect4.92
Creativity3.97
Feedback4.08
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.46
Questions4.87
William Paul Kleiber 38 grades · 1 term 4.00GPA
38 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kleiber vs. the course average
A
+3.0
B
−1.5
C
same
D
−1.5
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 38 enrolled.
Overall4.77 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.23
Synthesis3.69
Collaboration3.85
Connection4.38
Contribution4.38
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.23
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.38
Challenge4.38
Questions4.85
Zachary Peter Kilpatrick 10 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
10 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 10 enrolled.
Overall4.75 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.86
Technology4.54
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.99
Connection4.83
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.46
Grading4.53
Reflection4.82
Respect4.97
Creativity4.41
Feedback4.42
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.56
Questions4.74
Stephen R Becker 15 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.74GPA
15 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 15 enrolled.
Mark Hoefer 15 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.67GPA
15 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 15 enrolled.
Paul William Kleiber 7 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.20
Grading5.00
Reflection4.40
Respect4.40
Creativity4.40
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions4.90
Bengt Fornberg 3 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.70
Connection5.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.70
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Ian G Grooms 1 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Keith Julien 1 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Robert W Benim 8 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.60
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.90
Grading3.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions4.90
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.