Course record APPM
APPM 5720
Open Topics in Applied Mathematics
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable10 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score40/100
Mixed recordMaziar Raissi 69 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5
69 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.07
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration3.74
Connection4.64
Contribution4.07
Discussion4.76
Inclusivity3.99
Grading4.37
Reflection4.53
Respect4.76
Creativity4.29
Feedback4.02
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.32
Questions4.58
Ian G Grooms 1 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration2.00
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity2.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
David Matthew Bortz 14 reported responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.66
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.68
Connection4.94
Contribution4.97
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.94
Grading3.71
Reflection4.68
Respect4.99
Creativity4.47
Feedback3.03
Interaction4.31
Challenge4.95
Questions4.98
James H Curry 7 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.99
Technology4.96
Synthesis4.96
Collaboration4.96
Connection4.95
Contribution4.98
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.52
Reflection4.98
Respect4.99
Creativity4.94
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.98
Questions4.98
Jesus Ivan Portilla 3 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Daniel Gregory Brown 5 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.88
Collaboration4.31
Connection4.88
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.77
Reflection4.88
Respect5.00
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.12
Interaction4.42
Challenge4.77
Questions5.00
Stephen R Becker 1 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.00
Respect4.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Manuel Bosco Lladser 5 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.30
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration2.60
Connection3.20
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.60
Reflection5.00
Respect4.80
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Bradley W Hindman 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Eduardo Corona 4 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.30
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.20
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.20
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.