Course record APPM
APPM 4360
Methods in Applied Mathematics: Complex Variables and Applications
University of Colorado Boulder
310 grades7 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score31/100
Below average
Sean D Nixon 51 grades · 1 term 3.43GPA
51 letter grades
Compare with the course
Nixon vs. the course average
A
−1.6
B
+6.4
C
−3.2
D
−1.0
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
12.1% withdrew · 7 of 58 enrolled.
Overall3.82 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.01
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.98
Collaboration3.81
Connection3.43
Contribution3.72
Discussion3.55
Inclusivity4.18
Grading3.15
Reflection4.09
Respect4.48
Creativity3.67
Feedback2.97
Interaction3.93
Challenge3.92
Questions3.88
Mark Hoefer 64 grades · 1 term 3.40GPA
64 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hoefer vs. the course average
A
+7.2
B
−7.8
C
−0.8
D
+0.6
F
+0.9
Difference in percentage points.
3.0% withdrew · 2 of 66 enrolled.
Overall4.38 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration3.75
Connection4.00
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.45
Reflection4.35
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Mark J Ablowitz 177 grades · 1 term 3.35GPA
177 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ablowitz vs. the course average
A
−2.1
B
+0.6
C
+1.4
D
+0.2
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
4.8% withdrew · 9 of 186 enrolled.
Overall3.54 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.17
Technology2.98
Synthesis3.31
Collaboration3.18
Connection2.58
Contribution2.24
Discussion2.79
Inclusivity2.18
Grading3.06
Reflection3.20
Respect3.71
Creativity3.64
Feedback2.37
Interaction3.50
Challenge3.51
Questions3.40
Bengt Fornberg 18 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.46GPA
18 letter grades · Limited sample
5.3% withdrew · 1 of 19 enrolled.
Overall4.17 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology3.60
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.30
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.40
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.80
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.60
Questions4.10
Jonathan R Kish 16 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.30
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.50
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
James D Meiss 4 reported responses 3.78Eval / 5
Overall3.78 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.20
Contribution3.20
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity2.00
Grading4.20
Reflection3.50
Respect4.30
Creativity3.00
Feedback3.50
Interaction3.50
Challenge4.00
Questions4.50
Yermal Sujeet Bhat 9 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.80
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.