Course record APPM
APPM 4350
Methods in Applied Mathematics: Fourier Series and Boundary Value Problems
University of Colorado Boulder
304 grades5 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score47/100
Mixed recordHarvey Segur 43 grades · 1 term 3.73GPA
43 letter grades
Compare with the course
Segur vs. the course average
A
+15.9
B
−11.3
C
−4.6
D
−0.7
F
+0.7
Difference in percentage points.
8.5% withdrew · 4 of 47 enrolled.
Overall3.70 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology2.55
Synthesis3.65
Collaboration3.50
Connection3.70
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity2.75
Grading2.90
Reflection3.70
Respect4.65
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.15
Challenge4.00
Questions3.05
Yermal Sujeet Bhat 194 grades · 1 term 3.60GPA
194 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bhat vs. the course average
A
+4.4
B
−3.6
C
+0.5
D
−0.7
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
5.8% withdrew · 12 of 206 enrolled.
Overall4.56 / 5
70 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.69
Collaboration4.36
Connection4.71
Contribution4.27
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity4.22
Grading4.51
Reflection4.80
Respect4.88
Creativity4.66
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.82
Questions4.73
Mark J Ablowitz 42 grades · 1 term 3.21GPA
42 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ablowitz vs. the course average
A
−25.1
B
+20.1
C
+2.5
D
+1.7
F
+0.7
Difference in percentage points.
2.3% withdrew · 1 of 43 enrolled.
Overall3.75 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology3.11
Synthesis4.11
Collaboration3.17
Connection3.98
Contribution3.32
Discussion3.65
Inclusivity2.95
Grading3.52
Reflection3.86
Respect4.29
Creativity4.49
Feedback3.44
Interaction3.87
Challenge4.38
Questions4.21
Sean D Nixon 25 grades · 1 term 3.13GPA
25 letter grades
Compare with the course
Nixon vs. the course average
A
−19.2
B
+14.1
C
−0.6
D
+3.3
F
+2.4
Difference in percentage points.
13.8% withdrew · 4 of 29 enrolled.
Overall3.55 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology3.87
Synthesis4.06
Collaboration3.84
Connection3.42
Contribution3.79
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity3.37
Grading2.77
Reflection3.71
Respect3.73
Creativity4.36
Feedback2.49
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.89
Questions3.47
Christina Wang 14 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration3.37
Connection3.83
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity3.45
Grading4.00
Reflection3.77
Respect4.75
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.15
Interaction3.90
Challenge4.35
Questions4.15
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.