Course record APPM

APPM 3570

Applied Probability

University of Colorado Boulder

710 grades9 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score13/100
Needs work

Professors 9 of 9

Evan David Gorman 52 grades · 1 term 2.70GPA
26.9% A
42.3% B
9.6% C
15.4% D
5.8% F

52 letter grades

Compare with the course
Gorman vs. the course average
A −1.4
B +10.6
C −10.9
D +6.4
F −4.7

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 52 enrolled.

Juan G Restrepo 133 grades · 1 term 2.67GPA
30.1% A
32.3% B
24.8% C
7.5% D
5.3% F

133 letter grades

Compare with the course
Restrepo vs. the course average
A +1.8
B +0.6
C +4.2
D −1.5
F −5.2

Difference in percentage points.

9.5% withdrew · 14 of 147 enrolled.

Manuel Bosco Lladser 162 grades · 1 term 2.63GPA
25.9% A
37.0% B
21.0% C
4.9% D
11.1% F

162 letter grades

Compare with the course
Lladser vs. the course average
A −2.4
B +5.3
C +0.4
D −4.1
F +0.7

Difference in percentage points.

9.5% withdrew · 17 of 179 enrolled.

Judith Law 211 grades · 1 term 2.57GPA
33.6% A
26.5% B
20.4% C
7.1% D
12.3% F

211 letter grades

Compare with the course
Law vs. the course average
A +5.3
B −5.1
C −0.2
D −1.9
F +1.9

Difference in percentage points.

10.6% withdrew · 25 of 236 enrolled.

Yermal Sujeet Bhat 152 grades · 1 term 2.31GPA
22.4% A
28.9% B
20.4% C
15.1% D
13.2% F

152 letter grades

Compare with the course
Bhat vs. the course average
A −5.9
B −2.7
C −0.2
D +6.1
F +2.7

Difference in percentage points.

4.4% withdrew · 7 of 159 enrolled.

Subekshya Bidari 17 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology3.95
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.15
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.65
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.60
Questions4.35
Nicolas Coloma Carphio 12 reported responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration2.70
Connection3.70
Contribution3.65
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity3.25
Grading4.20
Reflection3.55
Respect4.45
Creativity4.60
Feedback3.70
Interaction3.65
Challenge4.30
Questions4.35
Brian Ha 10 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.10
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.45
Reflection4.50
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.40
Questions4.70
Yu-Jui Huang 13 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.95
Connection4.40
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.50
Reflection4.55
Respect4.95
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.45
Questions4.90
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.