Course record APPM
APPM 2720
Open Topics in Lower Division Applied Mathematics
University of Colorado Boulder
128 grades9 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score67/100
Strong
Theodore John Eberts 47 grades · 1 term 4.00GPA
47 letter grades
Compare with the course
Eberts vs. the course average
A
+19.5
B
−12.5
C
−3.9
D
−3.1
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
6.0% withdrew · 3 of 50 enrolled.
Overall4.87 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Silva Chang 55 grades · 1 term 3.32GPA
55 letter grades
Compare with the course
Chang vs. the course average
A
−25.9
B
+16.6
C
+5.2
D
+4.1
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
6.8% withdrew · 4 of 59 enrolled.
Overall4.60 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.53
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.51
Connection4.47
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity4.26
Grading4.63
Reflection4.26
Respect4.84
Creativity4.21
Feedback4.21
Interaction4.71
Challenge4.63
Questions4.99
Sara K Tro 14 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
14 letter grades · Limited sample
6.7% withdrew · 1 of 15 enrolled.
Overall4.73 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.80
Contribution4.40
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.80
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.40
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.80
Daniel Ames Messenger 12 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
12 letter grades · Limited sample
14.3% withdrew · 2 of 14 enrolled.
Caitlin Berry 7 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.70
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Teddy Eberts 8 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.30
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.60
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Tyler Jensen 4 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity4.80
Feedback3.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Connor Loehde-Woolard 5 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology2.25
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.00
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity4.25
Grading3.85
Reflection4.35
Respect4.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.10
Questions4.75
Sage Byron Shaw 13 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.35
Connection3.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.25
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.85
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.