Course record APPM
APPM 2351
Calculus 3 Work Group
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable13 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score69/100
Strong
Kevin Michael Doherty 7 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Heather Lynn Cihak 11 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.06
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.63
Reflection4.98
Respect4.98
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.73
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.76
Questions4.80
David S Stearns 9 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.40
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.70
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Theodore John Eberts 16 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.35
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.40
Grading5.00
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Zachary James Wiens 8 reported responses 3.90Eval / 5
Overall3.90 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology3.60
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.10
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity1.70
Grading3.30
Reflection4.00
Respect4.30
Creativity3.30
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.80
Questions4.50
Zach Sajevic 6 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology3.40
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Kate Boden 15 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.60
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.80
Reflection5.00
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Jonathan Shaw 10 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.90
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.60
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Connor Loehde-Woolard 4 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.50
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Maia Richards-Dinger 6 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.80
Reflection4.60
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.