Course record APPM

APPM 1650

Python for Math and Data Science Applications

University of Colorado Boulder

215 grades11 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score15/100
Needs work

Professors 10 of 11

Silva Chang 172 grades · 1 term 2.72GPA
30.8% A
28.5% B
28.5% C
7.6% D
4.7% F

172 letter grades

Compare with the course
Chang vs. the course average
A +4.3
B −1.3
C +0.1
D −0.8
F −2.3

Difference in percentage points.

10.4% withdrew · 20 of 192 enrolled.

Colin J Mitchell 43 grades · 1 term 2.13GPA
9.3% A
34.9% B
27.9% C
11.6% D
16.3% F

43 letter grades

Compare with the course
Mitchell vs. the course average
A −17.2
B +5.1
C −0.5
D +3.3
F +9.3

Difference in percentage points.

12.2% withdrew · 6 of 49 enrolled.

Logan Barnhart 18 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration4.43
Connection3.56
Contribution3.56
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity2.39
Grading4.63
Reflection4.41
Respect4.57
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.37
Questions4.83
Anna Hirschmann 28 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.61
Collaboration3.95
Connection4.23
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.01
Grading4.79
Reflection4.59
Respect4.89
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.51
Challenge4.76
Questions4.93
Frankie Nuffer-Rodriguez 5 reported responses 3.97Eval / 5
Overall3.97 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.15
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.35
Connection3.50
Contribution2.90
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.75
Reflection3.85
Respect4.25
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.00
Interaction3.35
Challenge5.00
Questions4.50
Ella Grace Finstuen 10 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.91
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.13
Connection4.50
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.63
Reflection4.70
Respect4.61
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.33
Challenge4.52
Questions4.78
Blake Musfeldt 3 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration3.70
Connection3.70
Contribution3.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.70
Reflection3.70
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback3.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge3.70
Questions5.00
Bart Chen 5 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.00
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity2.70
Grading3.80
Reflection4.20
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Matt Reichenbach 24 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration4.21
Connection4.14
Contribution4.11
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.74
Grading4.50
Reflection4.48
Respect4.80
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.02
Interaction4.43
Challenge4.42
Questions4.72
Klara Meymaris 5 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.20
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.40
Reflection4.40
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Show all 11 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.