Course record APPM
APPM 1650
Python for Math and Data Science Applications
University of Colorado Boulder
215 grades11 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score15/100
Needs work
Silva Chang 172 grades · 1 term 2.72GPA
172 letter grades
Compare with the course
Chang vs. the course average
A
+4.3
B
−1.3
C
+0.1
D
−0.8
F
−2.3
Difference in percentage points.
10.4% withdrew · 20 of 192 enrolled.
Overall4.25 / 5
65 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.97
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration3.63
Connection3.88
Contribution3.70
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity3.42
Grading3.93
Reflection4.14
Respect4.31
Creativity4.26
Feedback3.36
Interaction3.91
Challenge4.27
Questions4.49
Colin J Mitchell 43 grades · 1 term 2.13GPA
43 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mitchell vs. the course average
A
−17.2
B
+5.1
C
−0.5
D
+3.3
F
+9.3
Difference in percentage points.
12.2% withdrew · 6 of 49 enrolled.
Overall4.12 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.02
Collaboration3.08
Connection4.05
Contribution3.49
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.68
Grading4.01
Reflection4.25
Respect4.57
Creativity4.32
Feedback3.62
Interaction3.87
Challenge4.53
Questions4.34
Logan Barnhart 18 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration4.43
Connection3.56
Contribution3.56
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity2.39
Grading4.63
Reflection4.41
Respect4.57
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.37
Questions4.83
Anna Hirschmann 28 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.61
Collaboration3.95
Connection4.23
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.01
Grading4.79
Reflection4.59
Respect4.89
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.51
Challenge4.76
Questions4.93
Frankie Nuffer-Rodriguez 5 reported responses 3.97Eval / 5
Overall3.97 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.15
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.35
Connection3.50
Contribution2.90
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.75
Reflection3.85
Respect4.25
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.00
Interaction3.35
Challenge5.00
Questions4.50
Ella Grace Finstuen 10 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.91
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.13
Connection4.50
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.63
Reflection4.70
Respect4.61
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.33
Challenge4.52
Questions4.78
Blake Musfeldt 3 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration3.70
Connection3.70
Contribution3.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.70
Reflection3.70
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback3.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge3.70
Questions5.00
Bart Chen 5 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.00
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity2.70
Grading3.80
Reflection4.20
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Matt Reichenbach 24 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration4.21
Connection4.14
Contribution4.11
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.74
Grading4.50
Reflection4.48
Respect4.80
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.02
Interaction4.43
Challenge4.42
Questions4.72
Klara Meymaris 5 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.20
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.40
Reflection4.40
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Matthew Younce 16 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.12
Connection3.83
Contribution3.73
Discussion4.24
Inclusivity3.03
Grading3.81
Reflection4.48
Respect4.52
Creativity4.24
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.26
Questions4.66
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.