Course record APPM
APPM 1361
Calculus 2 Work Group
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable22 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score60/100
Strong
Serena Joy Dileonardo 25 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.60
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.20
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.65
Questions4.90
Theodore John Eberts 27 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.95
Connection3.80
Contribution4.65
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.80
Grading5.00
Reflection4.95
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions5.00
Evan David Gorman 5 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions5.00
Kyle James Weishaar 14 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.00
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.75
Reflection4.60
Respect4.95
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.35
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.45
Questions5.00
Kaloyan Parvanov Parvanov 9 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.60
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.20
Grading4.30
Reflection4.40
Respect4.20
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.40
Chi K Tran 5 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.60
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Madi Yerlanov 7 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.30
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.10
Questions4.60
Caleb Allen Jacobs 4 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.00
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity2.30
Grading5.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity3.70
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Carolyn Fulton 7 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.20
Grading4.50
Reflection4.70
Respect4.40
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Kate Boden 8 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.40
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.