Course record APPM
APPM 1361
Calculus 2 Work Group
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable22 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score60/100
Strong
Serena Joy Dileonardo 25 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.60
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.20
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.65
Questions4.90
Theodore John Eberts 27 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.95
Connection3.80
Contribution4.65
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.80
Grading5.00
Reflection4.95
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions5.00
Evan David Gorman 5 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions5.00
Kyle James Weishaar 14 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.00
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.75
Reflection4.60
Respect4.95
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.35
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.45
Questions5.00
Kaloyan Parvanov Parvanov 9 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.60
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.20
Grading4.30
Reflection4.40
Respect4.20
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.40
Chi K Tran 5 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.60
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Madi Yerlanov 7 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.30
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.10
Questions4.60
Caleb Allen Jacobs 4 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.00
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity2.30
Grading5.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity3.70
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Carolyn Fulton 7 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.20
Grading4.50
Reflection4.70
Respect4.40
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Kate Boden 8 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.40
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions5.00
Addie Mccurdy 9 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.90
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Tyler Jensen 9 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.60
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.85
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Anna Kinne Granquist 4 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.70
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect4.80
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.20
Questions5.00
Allyson Hineman 10 reported responses 4.94Eval / 5
Overall4.94 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Riley Fisher 26 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.27
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity3.93
Grading4.40
Reflection4.40
Respect4.87
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.63
Questions4.97
Jonathan Homan 4 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology3.00
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration3.80
Connection2.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity2.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.20
Respect4.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction3.80
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Samuel A Smith 28 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.20
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.65
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.90
Questions4.95
Nikole Scribner Trout 5 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.60
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Gabriel Cowley 12 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.90
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.60
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity2.70
Grading4.20
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Benjamin Lombardi 7 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.30
Connection2.30
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection3.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Toby Weed 13 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.95
Connection3.45
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.65
Grading3.95
Reflection4.80
Respect4.75
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.70
Ethan Shade 2 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.