Course record APPM
APPM 1351
Calculus 1 Work Group
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable18 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score52/100
Mixed record
Amanda Kelly Lococo 26 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.67
Connection3.60
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.80
Reflection4.33
Respect4.50
Creativity4.07
Feedback4.03
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.37
Questions4.73
Kyle James Weishaar 14 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Kaloyan Parvanov Parvanov 5 reported responses 3.86Eval / 5
Overall3.86 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.20
Technology4.00
Synthesis2.30
Collaboration3.80
Connection2.20
Contribution3.50
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity1.00
Grading4.80
Reflection2.60
Respect4.50
Creativity2.30
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.40
Questions5.00
Grant T Kellogg 13 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology3.82
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration4.94
Connection3.91
Contribution4.79
Discussion4.89
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.91
Reflection4.87
Respect4.77
Creativity4.38
Feedback4.81
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.74
Questions4.93
Anna Kinne Granquist 5 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.19
Synthesis4.49
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.21
Contribution4.92
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.67
Grading5.00
Reflection4.83
Respect4.75
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.92
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.92
Questions5.00
Serena Joy Dileonardo 11 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology3.70
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.60
Connection2.30
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity2.00
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity3.50
Feedback4.10
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Byanka Estudillo 18 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.67
Connection3.66
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.82
Grading4.38
Reflection4.52
Respect4.65
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.52
Questions4.65
Nicolas Coloma Carphio 14 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.50
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Zach Sajevic 21 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.87
Connection3.30
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity3.43
Grading4.33
Reflection4.20
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.43
Questions5.00
Jonathan Shaw 12 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.85
Connection3.45
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.55
Reflection4.40
Respect4.85
Creativity3.60
Feedback4.25
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.