Course record APPM
APPM 1345
Calculus 1 with Algebra, Part B
University of Colorado Boulder
134 grades8 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score26/100
Below average
Yermal Sujeet Bhat 61 grades · 1 term 3.03GPA
61 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bhat vs. the course average
A
+7.4
B
+6.4
C
−5.3
D
−4.8
F
−3.7
Difference in percentage points.
4.7% withdrew · 3 of 64 enrolled.
Overall4.18 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Technology3.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection2.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions4.00
Richard C Mcnamara 54 grades · 1 term 2.25GPA
54 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mcnamara vs. the course average
A
−8.7
B
−11.0
C
+10.9
D
+7.0
F
+1.8
Difference in percentage points.
1.8% withdrew · 1 of 55 enrolled.
Overall4.67 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.36
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.06
Collaboration3.83
Connection4.66
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity2.51
Grading4.86
Reflection4.86
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.87
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.83
Questions4.97
Caleb J Miller 19 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.56GPA
19 letter grades · Limited sample
5.0% withdrew · 1 of 20 enrolled.
Overall4.24 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.50
Connection3.90
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.10
Reflection4.60
Respect4.20
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Grant T Kellogg 10 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.87
Technology3.71
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration3.87
Connection2.99
Contribution3.97
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity3.11
Grading4.24
Reflection3.99
Respect4.50
Creativity4.24
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.34
Questions4.96
Christian Moore Carley 10 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.20
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.85
Reflection4.60
Respect4.65
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Samik Dasgupta 4 reported responses 3.81Eval / 5
Overall3.81 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.00
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.50
Contribution3.75
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.25
Reflection4.00
Respect4.75
Creativity4.25
Feedback3.75
Interaction3.75
Challenge3.50
Questions4.00
Molly Mcfaul 7 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.25
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.40
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity2.75
Grading3.50
Reflection4.90
Respect4.65
Creativity3.40
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Tony Samour 3 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.70
Reflection5.00
Respect4.50
Creativity4.70
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.