Course record APPM
APPM 1236
Precalculus Work Group
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable13 professors
Evaluations: 2022–2026
Flunk Score44/100
Mixed record
Lilac T Intrater 12 reported responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.47
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.17
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.13
Inclusivity3.73
Grading3.87
Reflection4.10
Respect4.00
Creativity2.70
Feedback3.87
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.07
Questions4.67
Ellery Galvin 3 reported responses 3.88Eval / 5
Overall3.88 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.30
Connection3.00
Contribution3.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.30
Reflection3.70
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Zach Sajevic 2 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection3.50
Respect4.50
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Erin Obermayer 26 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.93
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.03
Collaboration4.43
Connection3.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.93
Grading4.33
Reflection4.57
Respect4.50
Creativity4.13
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Samik Dasgupta 8 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.50
Connection2.90
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.30
Reflection4.60
Respect4.60
Creativity3.70
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Katie Spencer 14 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.88
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.14
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.05
Contribution4.86
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.84
Grading4.59
Reflection4.57
Respect4.98
Creativity4.86
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.59
Questions4.98
Mostafa Mohammadian 5 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity2.00
Grading4.40
Reflection5.00
Respect4.30
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Anna Hirschmann 20 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.80
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.60
Reflection4.80
Respect4.40
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Meilan Jess 10 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.30
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity3.70
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Josh Schultze 2 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.