Course record APPM
APPM 1235
Pre-Calculus for Engineers
University of Colorado Boulder
914 grades28 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score17/100
Needs work
Lilac T Intrater 72 grades · 1 term 2.53GPA
72 letter grades
Compare with the course
Intrater vs. the course average
A
+3.8
B
+8.9
C
−6.7
D
−4.3
F
−1.8
Difference in percentage points.
1.4% withdrew · 1 of 73 enrolled.
Overall4.24 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.35
Connection3.65
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.30
Reflection4.25
Respect4.15
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.55
Questions4.35
Grant T Kellogg 70 grades · 1 term 2.51GPA
70 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kellogg vs. the course average
A
+5.9
B
+1.4
C
−0.3
D
−2.7
F
−4.3
Difference in percentage points.
6.7% withdrew · 5 of 75 enrolled.
Overall4.53 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.69
Connection3.85
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.33
Reflection4.59
Respect4.86
Creativity4.08
Feedback4.71
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.52
Questions4.74
Lyndsey Julia Wong 31 grades · 1 term 2.29GPA
31 letter grades
Compare with the course
Wong vs. the course average
A
+1.0
B
+3.7
C
−3.1
D
−6.6
F
+5.0
Difference in percentage points.
11.4% withdrew · 4 of 35 enrolled.
Overall3.22 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.60
Technology2.50
Synthesis2.30
Collaboration4.10
Connection1.40
Contribution3.10
Discussion3.00
Inclusivity2.20
Grading2.90
Reflection3.10
Respect4.30
Creativity3.60
Feedback2.40
Interaction4.40
Challenge3.40
Questions4.00
Daniel Seneca Lindsey 446 grades · 1 term 2.28GPA
446 letter grades
Compare with the course
Lindsey vs. the course average
A
+0.9
B
−1.2
C
−0.2
D
+0.2
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
9.3% withdrew · 46 of 492 enrolled.
Overall4.38 / 5
133 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology3.97
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.47
Connection3.89
Contribution4.14
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.74
Grading4.46
Reflection4.43
Respect4.80
Creativity3.97
Feedback4.26
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.57
Questions4.64
Richard C Mcnamara 103 grades · 1 term 2.26GPA
103 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mcnamara vs. the course average
A
−3.8
B
+3.5
C
+0.2
D
−0.1
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
8.0% withdrew · 9 of 112 enrolled.
Overall4.11 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.56
Technology4.07
Synthesis3.86
Collaboration2.72
Connection3.79
Contribution3.52
Discussion4.37
Inclusivity3.05
Grading4.40
Reflection3.94
Respect4.83
Creativity3.74
Feedback3.71
Interaction3.88
Challenge4.32
Questions4.75
Byanka Estudillo 69 grades · 1 term 2.26GPA
69 letter grades
Compare with the course
Estudillo vs. the course average
A
−3.9
B
+3.3
C
+1.6
D
+0.3
F
−1.3
Difference in percentage points.
9.2% withdrew · 7 of 76 enrolled.
Overall3.85 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.35
Technology3.40
Synthesis3.25
Collaboration4.30
Connection3.10
Contribution3.65
Discussion4.05
Inclusivity2.90
Grading4.00
Reflection3.60
Respect4.40
Creativity3.35
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.40
Challenge3.85
Questions4.00
Colin J Mitchell 31 grades · 1 term 2.17GPA
31 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mitchell vs. the course average
A
−5.5
B
+0.5
C
+3.4
D
+3.1
F
−1.4
Difference in percentage points.
16.2% withdrew · 6 of 37 enrolled.
Overall4.10 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.41
Technology3.83
Synthesis4.26
Collaboration3.98
Connection3.48
Contribution3.88
Discussion4.28
Inclusivity2.63
Grading3.62
Reflection4.18
Respect4.55
Creativity3.66
Feedback4.38
Interaction4.37
Challenge4.34
Questions4.36
Samik Dasgupta 92 grades · 1 term 1.99GPA
92 letter grades
Compare with the course
Dasgupta vs. the course average
A
−3.2
B
−10.1
C
+4.8
D
+5.4
F
+3.1
Difference in percentage points.
8.9% withdrew · 9 of 101 enrolled.
Overall4.33 / 5
79 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology3.81
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration4.61
Connection3.70
Contribution4.26
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity3.63
Grading4.54
Reflection4.33
Respect4.71
Creativity4.41
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.64
Challenge4.65
Questions4.75
Saige Rose Drecksler 39 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.24
Technology4.29
Synthesis4.21
Collaboration4.29
Connection3.73
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.45
Reflection4.35
Respect4.46
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Alex Mcmanus 10 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.60
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.80
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.90
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.