Course record ANTH

ANTH 2100

Introduction to Cultural Anthropology

University of Colorado Boulder

1,232 grades33 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score39/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 33

Carole Ann Mcgranahan Ph.D. 156 grades · 1 term 3.63GPA
75.6% A
17.3% B
5.1% C
0.6% D
1.3% F

156 letter grades

Compare with the course
Ph.D. vs. the course average
A +17.2
B −6.8
C −2.8
D −3.1
F −4.5

Difference in percentage points.

2.5% withdrew · 4 of 160 enrolled.

Alison Collier Cool 169 grades · 1 term 3.40GPA
62.7% A
25.4% B
7.1% C
0.6% D
4.1% F

169 letter grades

Compare with the course
Cool vs. the course average
A +4.3
B +1.3
C −0.9
D −3.1
F −1.6

Difference in percentage points.

3.4% withdrew · 6 of 175 enrolled.

Kathryn Elissa Goldfarb 258 grades · 1 term 3.29GPA
58.9% A
24.0% B
10.1% C
3.5% D
3.5% F

258 letter grades

Compare with the course
Goldfarb vs. the course average
A +0.5
B −0.1
C +2.1
D −0.2
F −2.3

Difference in percentage points.

4.4% withdrew · 12 of 270 enrolled.

Kristen Drybread 51 grades · 1 term 3.11GPA
41.2% A
41.2% B
11.8% C
3.9% D
2.0% F

51 letter grades

Compare with the course
Drybread vs. the course average
A −17.3
B +17.1
C +3.8
D +0.2
F −3.8

Difference in percentage points.

1.9% withdrew · 1 of 52 enrolled.

Carla Mae Jones 598 grades · 1 term 3.07GPA
54.0% A
24.1% B
7.7% C
5.5% D
8.7% F

598 letter grades

Compare with the course
Jones vs. the course average
A −4.4
B same
C −0.3
D +1.8
F +2.9

Difference in percentage points.

4.6% withdrew · 29 of 627 enrolled.

Paige Edmiston 34 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5

34 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.97
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.93
Contribution4.87
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.93
Grading4.73
Reflection4.90
Respect4.97
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.97
Questions4.97
Caitrin Scarlett Engle 16 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.95
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.75
Reflection4.85
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.80
Questions4.85
Anna Kari Hermann 34 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

34 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.73
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.83
Grading4.47
Reflection4.80
Respect4.77
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.13
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.37
Questions4.67
Katherine V Fischer 51 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

51 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.13
Connection4.81
Contribution4.81
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.93
Grading4.26
Reflection4.73
Respect4.96
Creativity4.39
Feedback3.68
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.61
Questions4.75
Jason Bartholomew Scott 13 reported responses 3.92Eval / 5
Overall3.92 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology2.87
Synthesis3.66
Collaboration2.59
Connection3.78
Contribution3.25
Discussion4.02
Inclusivity4.21
Grading3.18
Reflection3.71
Respect4.95
Creativity3.64
Feedback3.62
Interaction4.09
Challenge4.07
Questions3.68
Show all 33 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.