Course record ANTH
ANTH 2030
Laboratory in Biological Anthropology 1
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable24 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score47/100
Mixed record
Oliver Charles Colvill Paine 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Oliver C.C. Paine 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Herbert H Covert 47 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5
47 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.19
Technology4.52
Synthesis3.92
Collaboration4.11
Connection4.01
Contribution3.96
Discussion4.36
Inclusivity3.69
Grading4.50
Reflection4.26
Respect4.69
Creativity3.83
Feedback4.04
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.24
Questions4.66
Christina M Ryder 4 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.50
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.70
Grading5.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Julie Marion Thomas 26 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.89
Connection4.59
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.32
Grading4.93
Reflection4.70
Respect4.67
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.75
Questions4.99
John Dalton 23 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.44
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.29
Contribution4.24
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity4.09
Grading4.58
Reflection4.68
Respect4.92
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.62
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.72
Questions5.00
Skye Barger 20 reported responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.05
Technology3.93
Synthesis2.94
Collaboration4.51
Connection3.12
Contribution2.83
Discussion2.97
Inclusivity4.33
Grading3.93
Reflection3.16
Respect3.93
Creativity2.54
Feedback3.59
Interaction4.03
Challenge2.96
Questions4.03
Collin Ross Power 5 reported responses 3.76Eval / 5
Overall3.76 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology3.75
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration3.75
Connection3.50
Contribution3.25
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.75
Reflection3.65
Respect4.25
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.40
Questions4.35
Jennifer Washabaugh 5 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.65
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.85
Reflection5.00
Respect4.75
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.65
Questions4.85
Olivia Lauren Kimes 6 reported responses 4.02Eval / 5
Overall4.02 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.15
Synthesis3.35
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.25
Grading4.65
Reflection3.90
Respect4.90
Creativity2.75
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.15
Challenge3.65
Questions4.65
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.