Course record ANTH
ANTH 2030
Laboratory in Biological Anthropology 1
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable24 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score47/100
Mixed record
Oliver Charles Colvill Paine 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Oliver C.C. Paine 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Herbert H Covert 47 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5
47 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.19
Technology4.52
Synthesis3.92
Collaboration4.11
Connection4.01
Contribution3.96
Discussion4.36
Inclusivity3.69
Grading4.50
Reflection4.26
Respect4.69
Creativity3.83
Feedback4.04
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.24
Questions4.66
Christina M Ryder 4 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.50
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.70
Grading5.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Julie Marion Thomas 26 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.89
Connection4.59
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.32
Grading4.93
Reflection4.70
Respect4.67
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.75
Questions4.99
John Dalton 23 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.44
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.29
Contribution4.24
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity4.09
Grading4.58
Reflection4.68
Respect4.92
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.62
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.72
Questions5.00
Skye Barger 20 reported responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.05
Technology3.93
Synthesis2.94
Collaboration4.51
Connection3.12
Contribution2.83
Discussion2.97
Inclusivity4.33
Grading3.93
Reflection3.16
Respect3.93
Creativity2.54
Feedback3.59
Interaction4.03
Challenge2.96
Questions4.03
Collin Ross Power 5 reported responses 3.76Eval / 5
Overall3.76 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology3.75
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration3.75
Connection3.50
Contribution3.25
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.75
Reflection3.65
Respect4.25
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.40
Questions4.35
Jennifer Washabaugh 5 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.65
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.85
Reflection5.00
Respect4.75
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.65
Questions4.85
Olivia Lauren Kimes 6 reported responses 4.02Eval / 5
Overall4.02 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.15
Synthesis3.35
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.25
Grading4.65
Reflection3.90
Respect4.90
Creativity2.75
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.15
Challenge3.65
Questions4.65
Kathleen Marie Mcguire 10 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.80
Grading5.00
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity3.95
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.65
Questions5.00
Michelle Linda Sauther 116 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
116 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.98
Technology4.62
Synthesis3.84
Collaboration4.94
Connection4.06
Contribution3.84
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity3.47
Grading4.70
Reflection4.30
Respect4.75
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.41
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.64
Questions4.78
Daniel Joseph Naumenko 25 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.01
Technology4.24
Synthesis4.34
Collaboration4.78
Connection3.54
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.51
Inclusivity3.43
Grading4.35
Reflection4.54
Respect4.51
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.24
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.65
Questions4.54
Sarah M Jaffe 11 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.45
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.85
Reflection4.55
Respect5.00
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Stephania Zneimer 19 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.36
Technology4.32
Synthesis3.74
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.56
Contribution4.03
Discussion4.22
Inclusivity3.49
Grading4.19
Reflection4.23
Respect4.41
Creativity3.74
Feedback3.52
Interaction4.52
Challenge4.30
Questions3.95
Jack Dalton 8 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.30
Grading5.00
Reflection4.60
Respect4.93
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Sarah Maureen Simeonoff 16 reported responses 4.93Eval / 5
Overall4.93 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.80
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.65
Grading5.00
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.95
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.95
Questions5.00
Emily Opack 15 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.96
Technology4.04
Synthesis2.72
Collaboration4.55
Connection3.14
Contribution3.65
Discussion4.04
Inclusivity3.56
Grading4.92
Reflection4.54
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback3.58
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.51
Questions5.00
Meg Hardie 17 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.56
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.79
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity4.72
Grading4.69
Reflection4.85
Respect4.94
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.56
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.73
Questions4.82
Yuti Gao 12 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.32
Synthesis4.12
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.72
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.78
Reflection4.16
Respect4.82
Creativity4.12
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.73
Questions4.69
Nicholas Hartman 18 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.70
Contribution4.52
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.39
Grading4.82
Reflection4.76
Respect4.79
Creativity4.12
Feedback4.36
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.96
Questions4.80
Michael Orellana 25 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.96
Technology4.43
Synthesis3.86
Collaboration4.77
Connection3.65
Contribution4.01
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity3.65
Grading4.66
Reflection4.19
Respect4.82
Creativity3.89
Feedback3.96
Interaction4.71
Challenge4.10
Questions4.48
Nate Lindsay 14 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology4.21
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.98
Connection3.59
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity3.71
Grading4.98
Reflection4.53
Respect5.00
Creativity3.94
Feedback4.12
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.92
Questions4.02
Stela Nomenjanahary 6 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.35
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.15
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.15
Reflection4.70
Respect4.50
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.85
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.