Course record ANTH
ANTH 2010
Introduction to Biological Anthropology 1
University of Colorado Boulder
2,103 grades12 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score12/100
Needs workOliver C.C. Paine 50 grades · 1 term 3.21GPA
50 letter grades
Compare with the course
Paine vs. the course average
A
+19.3
B
−10.4
C
−1.2
D
−3.6
F
−4.2
Difference in percentage points.
2.0% withdrew · 1 of 51 enrolled.
Overall4.41 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.08
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.55
Connection4.32
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.42
Grading4.70
Reflection4.33
Respect4.76
Creativity3.51
Feedback3.89
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.15
Questions4.87
Heather S. Williams 65 grades · 1 term 3.04GPA
65 letter grades
Compare with the course
Williams vs. the course average
A
+19.4
B
−13.1
C
−8.9
D
+2.1
F
+0.4
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 65 enrolled.
Overall3.51 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology3.82
Synthesis3.25
Collaboration3.25
Connection3.28
Contribution3.39
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.27
Grading4.06
Reflection3.77
Respect3.94
Creativity4.08
Feedback3.77
Interaction3.72
Challenge4.12
Questions4.26
Matthew James Sponheimer 1,354 grades · 1 term 2.84GPA
1,354 letter grades
Compare with the course
Sponheimer vs. the course average
A
same
B
+0.1
C
+1.2
D
+0.3
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
3.0% withdrew · 42 of 1,396 enrolled.
Overall3.99 / 5
588 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology4.27
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration3.79
Connection3.96
Contribution3.89
Discussion4.01
Inclusivity4.06
Grading4.01
Reflection3.94
Respect4.47
Creativity3.68
Feedback2.95
Interaction4.29
Challenge4.32
Questions4.01
Steven Robert Leigh 634 grades · 1 term 2.66GPA
634 letter grades
Compare with the course
Leigh vs. the course average
A
−3.5
B
+2.0
C
−1.6
D
−0.5
F
+3.7
Difference in percentage points.
3.8% withdrew · 25 of 659 enrolled.
Overall4.07 / 5
226 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.51
Technology4.71
Synthesis4.29
Collaboration3.53
Connection4.51
Contribution4.09
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity4.34
Grading4.72
Reflection4.53
Respect4.79
Creativity3.98
Feedback3.63
Interaction4.37
Challenge4.52
Questions4.76
Oliver Charles Colvill Paine 41 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.08
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.55
Connection4.32
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.42
Grading4.70
Reflection4.33
Respect4.76
Creativity3.51
Feedback3.89
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.15
Questions4.87
Christina M Ryder 58 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5
58 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration3.96
Connection4.59
Contribution4.12
Discussion4.44
Inclusivity4.42
Grading4.68
Reflection4.62
Respect4.74
Creativity3.95
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.47
Challenge4.29
Questions4.80
Cherriethel Kathleen W Emerson 7 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.39
Collaboration3.51
Connection4.80
Contribution4.59
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.39
Questions5.00
Julie Marion Thomas 4 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.30
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.30
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.70
Jonathan Aaron O Brien 3 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.30
Connection5.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Stephania Zneimer 86 reported responses 3.71Eval / 5
Overall3.71 / 5
86 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology4.44
Synthesis4.14
Collaboration3.86
Connection3.94
Contribution4.07
Discussion4.16
Inclusivity4.61
Grading3.54
Reflection3.93
Respect4.64
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.29
Interaction4.59
Challenge3.48
Questions3.50
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.