Course record ANTH

ANTH 2010

Introduction to Biological Anthropology 1

University of Colorado Boulder

2,103 grades12 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score12/100
Needs work

Professors 10 of 12

Oliver C.C. Paine 50 grades · 1 term 3.21GPA
46.0% A
32.0% B
20.0% C
2.0% D
0.0% F

50 letter grades

Compare with the course
Paine vs. the course average
A +19.3
B −10.4
C −1.2
D −3.6
F −4.2

Difference in percentage points.

2.0% withdrew · 1 of 51 enrolled.

Heather S. Williams 65 grades · 1 term 3.04GPA
46.2% A
29.2% B
12.3% C
7.7% D
4.6% F

65 letter grades

Compare with the course
Williams vs. the course average
A +19.4
B −13.1
C −8.9
D +2.1
F +0.4

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 65 enrolled.

Matthew James Sponheimer 1,354 grades · 1 term 2.84GPA
26.7% A
42.5% B
22.4% C
5.8% D
2.6% F

1,354 letter grades

Compare with the course
Sponheimer vs. the course average
A same
B +0.1
C +1.2
D +0.3
F −1.6

Difference in percentage points.

3.0% withdrew · 42 of 1,396 enrolled.

Steven Robert Leigh 634 grades · 1 term 2.66GPA
23.2% A
44.3% B
19.6% C
5.0% D
7.9% F

634 letter grades

Compare with the course
Leigh vs. the course average
A −3.5
B +2.0
C −1.6
D −0.5
F +3.7

Difference in percentage points.

3.8% withdrew · 25 of 659 enrolled.

Oliver Charles Colvill Paine 41 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

41 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.08
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.55
Connection4.32
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.42
Grading4.70
Reflection4.33
Respect4.76
Creativity3.51
Feedback3.89
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.15
Questions4.87
Christina M Ryder 58 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5

58 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration3.96
Connection4.59
Contribution4.12
Discussion4.44
Inclusivity4.42
Grading4.68
Reflection4.62
Respect4.74
Creativity3.95
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.47
Challenge4.29
Questions4.80
Cherriethel Kathleen W Emerson 7 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.39
Collaboration3.51
Connection4.80
Contribution4.59
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.39
Questions5.00
Julie Marion Thomas 4 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.30
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.30
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.70
Jonathan Aaron O Brien 3 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.30
Connection5.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Stephania Zneimer 86 reported responses 3.71Eval / 5
Overall3.71 / 5

86 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology4.44
Synthesis4.14
Collaboration3.86
Connection3.94
Contribution4.07
Discussion4.16
Inclusivity4.61
Grading3.54
Reflection3.93
Respect4.64
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.29
Interaction4.59
Challenge3.48
Questions3.50
Show all 12 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.