Course record ANTH

ANTH 1105

Exploring a Non-Western Culture: Tibet

University of Colorado Boulder

392 grades14 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score34/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 14

Carole Ann Mcgranahan Ph.D. 392 grades · 1 term 3.31GPA
61.0% A
20.4% B
11.5% C
3.3% D
3.8% F

392 letter grades

4.6% withdrew · 19 of 411 enrolled.

Carole Ann Mcgranahan 189 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

189 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.17
Synthesis4.29
Collaboration3.38
Connection4.59
Contribution3.79
Discussion4.19
Inclusivity4.78
Grading4.38
Reflection4.49
Respect4.70
Creativity4.38
Feedback3.98
Interaction4.31
Challenge4.48
Questions4.58
Devin Brent Pettigrew 7 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.90
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.70
Reflection4.90
Respect4.70
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Ferrell Page Mcclean 12 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.25
Connection4.65
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.55
Reflection4.60
Respect4.75
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.35
Questions4.45
Kelly Anne Graves 13 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.15
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect4.85
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.35
Questions4.60
Paige Edmiston 17 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.50
Reflection4.65
Respect4.80
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Sangjie Zhaxi 45 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

45 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.27
Connection4.54
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.78
Grading4.44
Reflection4.77
Respect4.82
Creativity4.23
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.64
Challenge4.61
Questions4.83
Scarlett Engle 11 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration3.70
Connection3.70
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.00
Reflection4.25
Respect4.95
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.25
Challenge3.90
Questions3.95
Adi Prakash 14 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.35
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.15
Reflection4.60
Respect4.50
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.30
Questions4.25
Andrew Aceves 39 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5

39 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.26
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.57
Connection4.50
Contribution4.19
Discussion4.39
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.22
Reflection4.50
Respect4.73
Creativity3.87
Feedback4.01
Interaction4.56
Challenge4.02
Questions4.44
Show all 14 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.