Course record AIRR
AIRR 4010
National Security, Leadership Responsibilities/Commissioning Preparation 1
University of Colorado Boulder
147 grades6 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score71/100
Strong
Kamal Kaaoush 43 grades · 1 term 3.80GPA
43 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kaaoush vs. the course average
A
+6.7
B
−4.7
C
−1.4
D
same
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
6.5% withdrew · 3 of 46 enrolled.
Overall4.89 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.85
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.75
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.75
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.95
Questions5.00
Ryan Michael Collazo 28 grades · 1 term 3.75GPA
28 letter grades
Compare with the course
Collazo vs. the course average
A
+0.5
B
−2.0
C
+2.2
D
same
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 28 enrolled.
Overall4.82 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Melissa Riester 29 grades · 1 term 3.69GPA
29 letter grades
Compare with the course
Riester vs. the course average
A
−2.3
B
+0.9
C
+2.1
D
same
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
3.3% withdrew · 1 of 30 enrolled.
Overall4.86 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.41
Synthesis4.91
Collaboration4.91
Connection5.00
Contribution4.69
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.91
Reflection4.81
Respect5.00
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.91
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.91
Questions5.00
Phillip Poundstone 47 grades · 1 term 3.67GPA
47 letter grades
Compare with the course
Poundstone vs. the course average
A
−5.0
B
+5.0
C
−1.4
D
same
F
+1.4
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 47 enrolled.
Overall4.46 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.60
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.30
Reflection4.35
Respect4.35
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.65
Questions4.15
Paul Burk 3 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Eric S Skrla 28 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.60
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.40
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions4.55
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.