Course record AIRR
AIRR 1010
Heritage and Values I
University of Colorado Boulder
240 grades7 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score61/100
Strong
Patrick Andrew Rauker 50 grades · 1 term 3.83GPA
50 letter grades
Compare with the course
Rauker vs. the course average
A
+20.3
B
−16.8
C
−3.8
D
+0.8
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
3.8% withdrew · 2 of 52 enrolled.
Overall4.41 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.65
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.70
Reflection4.55
Respect4.70
Creativity3.95
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.20
Questions4.45
Jason Daniel Smith 75 grades · 1 term 3.67GPA
75 letter grades
Compare with the course
Smith vs. the course average
A
+5.7
B
−2.2
C
−1.1
D
−1.3
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
5.1% withdrew · 4 of 79 enrolled.
Overall4.54 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.25
Connection4.45
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.85
Reflection4.40
Respect4.75
Creativity3.75
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.65
Questions4.65
Donald Wayne Long 61 grades · 1 term 3.40GPA
61 letter grades
Compare with the course
Long vs. the course average
A
−20.8
B
+18.5
C
+2.8
D
+0.4
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
1.6% withdrew · 1 of 62 enrolled.
Overall4.26 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.15
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.45
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.05
Grading4.05
Reflection4.50
Respect4.60
Creativity3.95
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.00
Questions4.30
Bradley Dean Michael 54 grades · 1 term 3.39GPA
54 letter grades
Compare with the course
Michael vs. the course average
A
−3.1
B
−2.3
C
+1.8
D
+0.6
F
+3.1
Difference in percentage points.
8.5% withdrew · 5 of 59 enrolled.
Overall4.67 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.85
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.55
Reflection4.75
Respect4.65
Creativity3.85
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.80
Questions4.85
Bradley Spears 15 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.85
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.50
Reflection4.75
Respect4.85
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.80
Questions4.70
Eric S Skrla 45 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.95
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.60
Reflection4.85
Respect4.90
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.75
Questions4.80
Melissa Riester 12 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.85
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.40
Reflection4.70
Respect4.95
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.70
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.