Course record AHUM
AHUM 1825
Data Science for Humans in the Age of AI
University of Colorado Boulder
398 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2025
Flunk Score13/100
Needs work
David R. Glimp 398 grades · 1 term 2.87GPA
398 letter grades
5.7% withdrew · 24 of 422 enrolled.
Overall3.96 / 5
361 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.97
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.73
Collaboration4.05
Connection4.30
Contribution3.62
Discussion4.01
Inclusivity4.15
Grading3.85
Reflection3.96
Respect4.54
Creativity3.88
Feedback3.38
Interaction4.24
Challenge3.85
Questions4.08
Eric Alan Vance 105 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5
105 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.09
Synthesis3.89
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.25
Contribution3.99
Discussion4.19
Inclusivity4.09
Grading3.36
Reflection3.74
Respect4.42
Creativity4.09
Feedback3.28
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.09
Questions4.07
Michael Schneider 14 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.33
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.37
Grading3.97
Reflection4.27
Respect4.50
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.13
Questions4.93
Brittany Whelan 45 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.11
Technology4.28
Synthesis3.88
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.13
Contribution3.86
Discussion4.26
Inclusivity4.17
Grading3.86
Reflection4.00
Respect4.44
Creativity4.08
Feedback4.02
Interaction4.34
Challenge4.24
Questions4.31
Morgan Llewellyn 134 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5
134 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.11
Technology4.44
Synthesis3.89
Collaboration4.29
Connection4.05
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.23
Inclusivity4.16
Grading4.00
Reflection4.07
Respect4.35
Creativity4.03
Feedback4.31
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.03
Questions4.37
Matthew Nesselrodt 25 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.43
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.50
Reflection4.53
Respect4.87
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.73
Questions4.93
Chloe Zehr 132 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
132 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.08
Collaboration4.42
Connection4.29
Contribution3.88
Discussion4.37
Inclusivity4.39
Grading4.24
Reflection4.34
Respect4.53
Creativity4.23
Feedback4.41
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.45
Questions4.49
Sarah Alcantar 112 reported responses 3.92Eval / 5
Overall3.92 / 5
112 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.10
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.10
Grading3.70
Reflection3.90
Respect4.30
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.00
Questions4.10
Stephania Zneimer 106 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5
106 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.10
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.00
Reflection3.90
Respect4.30
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.00
Questions4.30
Nathan Dickman Pieplow 14 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.40
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.